Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Record Layer Format

2017-03-08 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Ilari, yes, I am exactly talking about these bytes that are useless to send around in some deployment environments. I would expect to at least provide the option of not sending the data in some cases would be useful. Ciao Hannes On 03/06/2017 04:55 PM, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06

[TLS] Agenda items for TLS at IETF-98

2017-03-08 Thread Joseph Salowey
The TLS WG is scheduled to meet at 9:00-11:30 in the Tuesday Morning session. Please send in requests for agenda time to the chairs. We will be giving priority to any remaining open TLS 1.3 issues and drafts discussed on the list. Cheers, J&S ___ TLS

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Record Layer Format

2017-03-08 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On 03/08/2017 04:25 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Ilari, > > yes, I am exactly talking about these bytes that are useless to send > around in some deployment environments. > > I would expect to at least provide the option of not sending the data in > some cases would be useful. > I would not e

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Record Layer Format

2017-03-08 Thread Eric Rescorla
FWIW, I think DTLS 1.3 should just do this (and other header shortening stuff). I don't know of any evidence that there are policy enforcement boxes for DTLS -Ekr On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On 03/08/2017 04:25 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > Hi Ilari, > > yes, I a

Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 Record Layer Format

2017-03-08 Thread Martin Thomson
On 9 March 2017 at 08:46, Eric Rescorla wrote: > FWIW, I think DTLS 1.3 should just do this (and other header shortening > stuff). > I don't know of any evidence that there are policy enforcement boxes for > DTLS Definitely. I also think that DTLS 1.3 could stand to lose a few sequence number an

Re: [TLS] (no subject)

2017-03-08 Thread Eric Rescorla
Based on people's seeming mild preference for option #1, I have produced: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/901 I'll merge this tomorrow absent some loud screaming. -Ekr On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Hi folks, > > We need to close on an issue about the size of

[TLS] Fwd: OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-14

2017-03-08 Thread Yoav Nir
Also forwarding to TLS I have created https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pull/34 I’ll merge this if there are no objections just before the submission cut-off and submit a new version. Yoav > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Yoav Nir > Subjec