https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1143
From: Eric Rescorla
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 1:25 PM
To: R du Toit
Cc: "tls@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [TLS] ServerHello extensions
Thanks. These are good points. I would welcome a PR.
Thanks. These are good points. I would welcome a PR.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:21 AM, R du Toit wrote:
> Issue#1: Section "4.1.3 Server Hello" currently states:
>
> *extensions A list of extensions. The ServerHello MUST only include
> extensions which are required to establish
On 01/18/2018 12:21 PM, R du Toit wrote:
> I can add a PR for both issues, if you agree.
Please do.
-Ben
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Issue#1: Section "4.1.3 Server Hello" currently states:
extensions A list of extensions. The ServerHello MUST only include extensions
which are required to establish the cryptographic context. Currently the only
such extensions are “key_share” and “pre_shared_key”. All current TLS 1.3
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
> The specification of the new signature_algorithms_cert seems somewhat
> lacking to me. There is very little description about how it should be
> interpreted. About the best I can get from the spec is this:
>
>The
The specification of the new signature_algorithms_cert seems somewhat
lacking to me. There is very little description about how it should be
interpreted. About the best I can get from the spec is this:
The "signature_algorithms_cert" extension applies to signatures in
certificates and the