On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, at 19:03, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> I do not think that 64 is not hard to implement, but I think it is very
> hard to implement it in a way that it is efficient.
Totally agree. There's like a curve for performance with an asymptote as
records get bigger and a steep
(This is another installment of our experiences with deploying the
RFC-final TLS 1.3—previous messages: [1][2]. We share these with the
community to hopefully avoid other people hitting the same issues.)
In the last update, David reported our experience with a bug[3] in
Java 11's TLS 1.3
