On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:38 PM Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Watson Ladd wrote:
> > Nick mentioned at the WG meeting today we were having some hiccups.
> > These hiccups have been fixed and we have a delegated credential.
> > Please let us know the results.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Watson Ladd wrote:
> Nick mentioned at the WG meeting today we were having some hiccups.
> These hiccups have been fixed and we have a delegated credential.
> Please let us know the results. Note the cert has an extra 05 00 in
> the extension.
What TLS ext
First of all, I would say that this is excellent work, and I would support
making this a working group item.
As for my comments (both on the document itself, and my opinions on
alternatives that the document lists):
* 2.1. Negotiation of the use of hybridization in general and component
a
On Wednesday, 27 March 2019 14:42:49 CET Martin Thomson wrote:
> Why not go all in - make this a byte string and start from 0x80 in the first
> byte. When we define the 9th flag, we add another byte. Then you have up
> to 2040 flags (though it might pay to split the space before that).
>
> struc
On Wednesday, 27 March 2019 15:35:21 CET Martin Thomson wrote:
> Inspired by a few side discussions and Yoav's new draft, I have the pleasure
> of announcing the first proposal to use that mechanism:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-tls-sic-00
in the situation when the server or cli
