I also made a number of comments, but I think it's roughly fine.
-Ekr
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:08 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> I made a few comments on the pull request, but they are minor. Let's do
> this.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, at 03:07, Sean Turner wrote:
> > hi TLS WG,
> >
> > During the
I made a few comments on the pull request, but they are minor. Let's do this.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, at 03:07, Sean Turner wrote:
> hi TLS WG,
>
> During the consensus call to determine whether ticket reuse use cases
> should be supported we did not see consensus to add that text, but we
> did s
hi TLS WG,
During the consensus call to determine whether ticket reuse use cases should be
supported we did not see consensus to add that text, but we did seem some
potential emerging consensus to add a second field to the extension;
technically, it is to rename count->new_session_count and add
hi TLS WG,
Thank you for your input during the consensus call to add ticket reuse text to
draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests. What we see are some very strongly held
positions on both sides of this issue, but what we do not see is consensus to
add text to support the ticket reuse case. What this mea
