[TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-subcerts-08.txt

2020-06-03 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF. Title : Delegated Credentials for TLS Authors : Richard Barnes Subodh Iyengar

Re: [TLS] Working group last call for draft-ietf-tls-subcerts-07

2020-06-03 Thread Nick Sullivan
Hello TLSWG, We made a -08 version of this draft before the WGLC that incorporated some of the comments on-list for -07, but didn't notice until now that the submission didn't go through and therefore wasn't available for this RGLC. I apologize for this oversight. This submission just went through

Re: [TLS] Working group last call for draft-ietf-tls-subcerts-07

2020-06-03 Thread Russ Housley
Nick: There is something wrong with the formatting of the numbered list in Section 4.1.3. Russ > On Jun 3, 2020, at 4:20 PM, Nick Sullivan > wrote: > > Hello TLSWG, > > We made a -08 version of this draft before the WGLC that incorporated some of > the comments on-list for -07, but didn't

Re: [TLS] Working group last call for draft-ietf-tls-subcerts-07

2020-06-03 Thread Nick Sullivan
Thanks Russ, I filed an issue to address it. On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:27 PM Russ Housley wrote: > Nick: > > There is something wrong with the formatting of the numbered list in > Section 4.1.3. > > Russ > > On Jun 3, 2020, at 4:20 PM, Nick Sullivan < > nick=40cloudflare@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote

[TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-03 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6204 -- Type: Editorial Re

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-03 Thread Martin Thomson
I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. There is one other piece to this that is very confusing, and less clear. "Servers which are authenticating with a PSK MUST NOT send the Certific

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-03 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson wrote: > I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The > extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. > Yes, although 8773 actually is not super-clear about post-handshake, so that's actually

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-03 Thread Martin Thomson
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, at 11:44, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I think it would help to be more explicit here: > Servers which are authenticating with a resumption PSK MUST NOT send > the CertificateRequest message in the main handshake, [...], > Servers which are authenticating with an external PSK MUST N

Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

2020-06-03 Thread Christopher Wood
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020, at 6:47 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, at 11:44, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > I think it would help to be more explicit here: > > Servers which are authenticating with a resumption PSK MUST NOT send > > the CertificateRequest message in the main handshake, [..

[TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6205)

2020-06-03 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6205 -- Type: Editorial Re

[TLS] Progressing DTLS 1.3 (was Re: 3rd WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-dtls13)

2020-06-03 Thread Sean Turner
All, Changes introduced in -38 were well discussed on the list. The AEAD limits are the notable exception however those changes are to address findings discovered by security researchers. The chairs believe that -38 is ready for AD review. spt (for the chairs) > On Mar 20, 2020, at 10:17, Sean