[TLS] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-13

2020-07-02 Thread Sean Turner via Datatracker
Sean Turner has requested publication of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-13 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the TLS working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator/

Re: [TLS] Closing WGLC (was Re: 3rd WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticators)

2020-07-02 Thread Sean Turner
Great! This document is now ready to progress to the AD. spt > On Jun 26, 2020, at 20:00, Nick Sullivan wrote: > > TLSWG and Chairs, > > I've submitted draft -13 with the appropriate changes. > > Best, > Nick > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23 AM Sean Turner wrote: > Hi! > > This message

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-guidance-00.txt

2020-07-02 Thread Sean Turner
Just a reminder to please have a look at this draft. spt > On Jun 19, 2020, at 23:39, Sean Turner wrote: > > Thanks to Chris for uploading the WG version of the draft. > > If you have some time over the next couple of weeks please take the time to > review this draft. The intent is to issue

[TLS] tls - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 108

2020-07-02 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Joseph Salowey, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. tls Session 1 (1:40 requested) Tuesday, 28 July 2020, Session III 1410-1550 Room Name: Room 6 size: 6

Re: [TLS] 2nd WGLC for Delegated Credentials for TLS

2020-07-02 Thread Daniel Migault
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jonathan Hoyland wrote: > Hi All, > > For those interested, I've been working on a formal analysis of DCs the > results of which should appear online in the next few days. > I'll post to the list when it's up. > > Great! Thanks. > In summary I managed to prove a

Re: [TLS] 2nd WGLC for Delegated Credentials for TLS

2020-07-02 Thread Jonathan Hoyland
Hi All, For those interested, I've been working on a formal analysis of DCs the results of which should appear online in the next few days. I'll post to the list when it's up. In summary I managed to prove a server only version of DCs secure (i.e. does not violate any of the properties in

Re: [TLS] Proposed change in TLS-Flags

2020-07-02 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi Yoav, > If that’s something the group wants, we can add it, but it’s not generally a > good thing for a protocol to have two ways of expressing the same thing. I saw it more as a "compression" mechanism for those cases where an extension doesn't carry additional content. Ciao Hannes Yoav