On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 10:35, Arnaud.Taddei.IETF
wrote:
> I strongly support this work as it represents capabilities that are being
> developed, deployed and used in practice. It has good intentions and provides
> a good approach in the context of defense in depth approaches. No security
> cann
As authors we appreciate all the constructive comments on the draft. Based on
the feedback, we will revise the scope of the document to cover “plain” TLS
proxy only (removing “selective proxying”). We will circulate a new revision
when it is ready.
Best,
-Eric (on behalf of the authors)
On
Hi,
I think this WG is a bit zombie-like. Its most recent milestones are from
2013 [1].
I favor rejecting all active drafts (although I can see value in publishing
them via the ISE), and closing this WG.
thanks,
Rob
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsec/about/
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 11:41
Just a reminder that this WG adoption call is still ongoing.
spt
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 14:55, Sean Turner wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The authors of "Return Routability Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3" have
> asked for adoption of their draft as a WG item. Please state whether you
> support adoption
