This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As
mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446 (as
identified below). No other semantic changes were made.
Errata fixed:
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6141, via
https://github.com/ekr
I support this and will help work on it.
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
Unsurprisingly, I support adoption. My hope here is that we can quickly
flush out remaining issues that could cause confusion and get this to the
IESG.
-Ekr
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 9:20 AM Salz, Rich
wrote:
> I support this and will help work on it.
>
> _
I support adoption on this.
Yes, I'll assist in reviews, etc.
tim
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:18 PM Christopher Wood
wrote:
> This email begins the adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis. As
> mentioned [1], this updates language and fixes some errata against RFC8446
> (as identified
I support adoption and I am willing to help work on this. (Eric has already
incorporated many of my suggestions, many thanks for that.)
___
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
I support adoption and am willing to help review.
In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446:
https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00
David
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Ben Smyth wrote:
> I support adoption
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi
wrote:
> I support adoption and am willing to help review.
>
> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=rfc8446&url2=draft-rescorla-tls-rfc8446-bis-00
>
Thanks. I a
Let the chairs know if you can help out as note taker or jabber scribe:
The Transport Layer Security (tls) WG will hold a virtual interim meeting
on 2020-09-03 from 10:00 to 11:00 America/Los_Angeles (17:00 to 18:00 UTC).
Agenda:
ECH Issue Discussion
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/i
I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi
> wrote:
>
>> I support adoption and am willing to help review.
>>
>> In case anyone else finds it helpful, here's a diff from RFC 8446:
>>
I support adoption.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 6:17 PM Richard Barnes wrote:
> I agree that this is a worthwhile effort for the WG.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 16:05 Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:52 PM David Schinazi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I support adoption and am willing to
10 matches
Mail list logo