Fine by me.
> On Feb 24, 2021, at 10:07 AM, Christopher Wood wrote:
>
> The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official target
> for interop. The diff between this version and the current editor's copy of
> the draft is below:
>
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:35 PM Stephen Farrell
wrote:
> - This is *much* harder to implement compared to ESNI as
>it interacts with the rest of the TLS stack/library in
>many more ways. It should be an explicit goal to reduce
>that complexity IMO and not increase it further. That
>
This should be fine. Moving to HPKE-v1 will remove an awkward dependency
problem now that we're starting to use HPKE for other things.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 05:07, Christopher Wood wrote:
> The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official
> target for interop. The diff b
