Greetings,
FYI - this report has been deleted as junk (identical text is listed in
Original Text, Corrected Text, and Notes, and this text does not even appear in
this RFC).
Thank you.
RFC Editor/rv
> On Dec 21, 2023, at 7:02 PM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8996,
"Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7739
--
Type: Editorial
Reported by: mohamed
You can tell the reader whatever you want. The fact remains that if the only
way to add QR to the currently deployed TLS-1.2-based “stuff” is modifying
TLS-1.2, then that’s what will be done in that particular case.
Of course. We’re not the protocol police and nobody from the IETF will come
-1 to Tim.
You can tell the reader whatever you want. The fact remains that if the only
way to add QR to the currently deployed TLS-1.2-based “stuff” is modifying
TLS-1.2, then that’s what will be done in that particular case.
I hope that the majority of the installed base would be
+1 to Tim - tell the reader explicitly that they will only ever get PQC w/
TLS 1.3 or higher.
Cheers,
- Ira
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023, 12:34 PM Tim Hollebeek wrote:
> I personally think this point is important enough to be made explicitly
> instead of implicitly.
>
>
>
> If we want to communicate
I personally think this point is important enough to be made explicitly instead
of implicitly.
If we want to communicate loudly and clearly that post-quantum cryptography is
NEVER coming to TLS 1.2, we need to explicitly say that.
Otherwise people will say “I know you said TLS 1.2 was
