+1.
I am also confused by the *. I open the link via web.
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Russ Housley
发送时间: 2018年8月10日 6:08
收件人: Christopher Wood
抄送: IETF TLS
主题: Re: [TLS] Minutes for TLS IETF 102 uploaded
I do not understand the formatting. Are the '*'
I also agree adopting this WG draft. This feature will help a lot to solve the
NAT rebinding problems in IOT fields. Happy to see that there was a strong WG
consensus on adopting the draft in Singapore.
Yin Xinxing
发件人: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tobias Gondrom
发送时间: 2017年12月13日 11:06
I agree with Matt. The port/IP could be reallocated to the peer that sends
packets with connection ID.
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Matt Caswell
发送时间: 2017年11月3日 0:32
收件人: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Connection ID Draft
On 17/10/17 22:35, Martin Thomson
hold.
发件人: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com]
发送时间: 2017年10月26日 12:05
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Connection ID Draft
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:02 PM, yinxinxing
mailto:yinxinx...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Ekr,
Sorry for the delay. I don’t quite understand “The wa
matched in the receiver's 5-tuple table.
For the above choices, what do you think? Or do you have any other good
solution to be updated in the draft?
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
发件人: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com]
发送时间: 2017年10月23日 20:13
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Connecti
include C-CID), and client will
use S-CID in its application message. Will the draft cover this scenario?
Yin Xinxing
发件人: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com]
发送时间: 2017年10月13日 21:00
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Connection ID Draft
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:11 AM, yinxinxing
Hi Martin,
According to the code you described in previous email, ISTM your idea of
parsing the standard packet and CID packet is using the 5-tuple. The benefit is
that no new contenttype or version is needed. But the precondition for well
working is that the 5-tuple of the CID packet will not
:47
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: 答复: [TLS] Connection ID Draft
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:41 PM, yinxinxing
mailto:yinxinx...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Thanks Ekr.
For “I explicitly did not want to do that, because there are a lot of valid
ways to generate CID. This is also what we
.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
发件人: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com]
发送时间: 2017年10月13日 21:00
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Connection ID Draft
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:11 AM, yinxinxing
mailto:yinxinx...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Ekr,
Thanks for your effort. The draft looks good.
is is what I mean "worse".
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net]
发送时间: 2017年10月13日 23:41
收件人: yinxinxing; Eric Rescorla; tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Connection ID Draft
I would like to focus on one of the points raised below:
I agree with Stephen. It is essential to ensure the new connection ID couldn't
be linked to the old one to avoid tracking risk.
However, it is some sort of implementation issues, and there are more ways to
do that(not only hash method). Maybe we can at least give suggestions or
warning in the d
Hi Ekr,
Thanks for your effort. The draft looks good. A few comments are listed below.
1. Based on the draft, for either DTLS1.2 or 1.3, server can’t
differentiate whether the packet from client is a “connection ID” packet or a
standard DTLS 1.2/1.3 packet. (I saw Thomas Fossati and Niko
Thanks Wing.
I am glad to discuss the technical details of CID draft with Hannes, Thomas and
Nikos.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: Dan Wing [mailto:danw...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月19日 0:34
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Sean Turner
主题: Re: [TLS] Solving the NAT expiring problem
don't need to bother the server(customer) to deploy anti-DOS
devices, why not have a try?
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: yinxinxing
发送时间: 2017年7月13日 16:56
收件人: 'Dan Wing'
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Sean Turner
主题: 答复: [TLS] Solving the NAT expiring problem causing DTLS renegotia
Hi Wing,
Please see the comments inline
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: Dan Wing [mailto:danw...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月13日 12:35
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Sean Turner
主题: Re: [TLS] Solving the NAT expiring problem causing DTLS renegotiation with
high power consumption in
Thanks Wing,
Please see my comments inline.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: Dan Wing [mailto:danw...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月13日 8:52
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Sean Turner
主题: Re: [TLS] Solving the NAT expiring problem causing DTLS renegotiation with
high power consumption in
Thanks Sean!
Your question and comments are valuable.
Please check my comments inline.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: Sean Turner [mailto:s...@sn3rd.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月12日 22:57
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TLS] Solving the NAT expiring problem causing DTLS
Hi Dan Wing,
Thanks for your comments.
Please see my comments inline.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
-邮件原件-
发件人: Dan Wing [mailto:danw...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月13日 1:09
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Sean Turner
主题: Re: [TLS] Solving the NAT expiring problem causing DTLS renegotiation with
solved
in DTLS 1.2 as soon as possible.
Any comment is appreciated.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
发件人: yinxinxing
发送时间: 2017年6月27日 16:28
收件人: 'Eric Rescorla'
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Tobias Gondrom
主题: Re: [TLS] Yin Xinxing joins the TLS WG
Thanks Eric,
I have seen the CID scheme, and talked with
, 1 million
connection is nothing.
Regards,
Yin Xinxing
发件人: Eric Rescorla [mailto:e...@rtfm.com]
发送时间: 2017年6月25日 21:33
收件人: yinxinxing
抄送: tls@ietf.org; Xiongxiaochun
主题: Re: [TLS] Yin Xinxing joins the TLS WG
Hi Yin,
The usual solution to this is to add a connection id. Please see:
https
Hello everyone,
I am Yin Xinxing from Huawei company. I am glad to join the TLS WG.
For the DLTS 1.3 draft, I am interested and have some ideas to talk with you.
DTLS has a lot of application scenarios in IOT fields, but currently, there is
some difficulty when DTLS 1.2 is applied to IOT device
21 matches
Mail list logo
