On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:28 AM Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2022, at 1:09 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I'd like to have a way to say "if you don't support session tickets,
> just ignore them".
> >
> > Again this text is not quite right because
>
> I think you're talking at cross purposes
On Nov 14, 2022, at 1:09 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I'd like to have a way to say "if you don't support session tickets, just
> ignore them".
>
> Again this text is not quite right because
I think you're talking at cross purposes to the problem I'm trying to
describe.
> Can you explain ho
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 9:55 AM Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > I don't believe this is correct.
>
> I'd like to have a way to say "if you don't support session tickets,
> just ignore them".
>
Again this text is not quite right because it is possible
On Nov 14, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I don't believe this is correct.
I'd like to have a way to say "if you don't support session tickets, just
ignore them".
Right now, the observed behaviour is "we don't support session tickets, so we
drop any TLS connection which uses th
I don't believe this is correct.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 8:50 AM RFC Errata System
wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446,
> "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3".
>
> --
> You may review the report below and
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446,
"The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7250
--
Type: Technical
Re
