On 1 September 2016 at 23:45, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> Should there be recommendation for clients to cut transfer and send
>> Finished if the client receives EncryptedExtensions without
>> early_data extension?
>
>
> I thought that was implicit, but i'd take a PR that did that.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:46 AM, David Benjamin
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Ilari Liusvaara > > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:29:00PM +, David
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:29:00PM +, David Benjamin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:29:00PM +, David Benjamin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Ilari Liusvaara <
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:29:00PM +, David Benjamin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
> >>
> >> Should there be recommendation for clients to cut transfer and send
>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:48:02AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Hubert Kario
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Ilari Liusvaara
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:48:02AM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm afraid that requiring the server to keep the connection
On Thursday, 1 September 2016 05:48:02 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:23:11 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Hubert Kario
> >
> > wrote:
>
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:23:11 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Hubert Kario
> wrote:
> > > Current draft has the following text in it:
> > > If any of these
On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 11:23:11 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > Current draft has the following text in it:
> > If any of these checks fail, the server MUST NOT respond
> > with the extension and must discard
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:14:33PM +0200, Hubert Kario wrote:
> Current draft has the following text in it:
>
> If any of these checks fail, the server MUST NOT respond
> with the extension and must discard all the remaining first
> flight data (thus falling back to 1-RTT). If the
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> Current draft has the following text in it:
>
> If any of these checks fail, the server MUST NOT respond
> with the extension and must discard all the remaining first
> flight data (thus falling back to
Current draft has the following text in it:
If any of these checks fail, the server MUST NOT respond
with the extension and must discard all the remaining first
flight data (thus falling back to 1-RTT). If the client attempts
a 0-RTT handshake but the server rejects it, it will
13 matches
Mail list logo