Hiya,
On 06/11/2021 22:20, Martin Thomson wrote:
I assume that you might add "just once" there. Or at least a limited
number of times.
Right. I think that's in the spec already.
Cheers,
S.
Infinite regress seems like something worth
avoiding. outer1 -> outer2 -> outer1 is likely not a
I assume that you might add "just once" there. Or at least a limited number of
times. Infinite regress seems like something worth avoiding. outer1 -> outer2
-> outer1 is likely not a great outcome.
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021, at 02:20, David Benjamin wrote:
> That's my inclination as well. It's an
That's my inclination as well. It's an odd thing for a server to do, but it
seems fine to just retry with the new config without much fuss?
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:18 AM Stephen Farrell
wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> Bit of a corner case I'm not sure about. Apologies
> if this has come up before.
>
>
Hiya,
Bit of a corner case I'm not sure about. Apologies
if this has come up before.
The scenario:
- inner SNI is inner.example
- ECHConfig from inner.example's DNS has outer.example
as public_name
- client authenticates with ClientHelloOuter and the
ServerHello contains retry_configs
