> I don't feel very strongly either way, though it is odd that it basically
> contradicts the sender's rules in RFC 8449.
>
>Higher values are currently reserved for future
>versions of the protocol that may allow larger records; an endpoint
>MUST NOT send a value higher than the proto
On Friday, 25 January 2019 17:23:22 CET David Benjamin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 5:03 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 07:23, David Benjamin wrote:
> > > > while record_size_limit extension sends just one value, it does
> > > > specifically
> > > > allow the client to a
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 5:03 PM Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 07:23, David Benjamin wrote:
> > > while record_size_limit extension sends just one value, it does
> > > specifically
> > > allow the client to advertise higher values than the protocol versions
> or
> > > extensions
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, at 07:23, David Benjamin wrote:
> > while record_size_limit extension sends just one value, it does
> > specifically
> > allow the client to advertise higher values than the protocol versions or
> > extensions would indicate
> >
> > I wonder if sending such values shouldn't be
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 15:38, David Benjamin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:31 PM Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 January 2019 21:23:37 CET David Benjamin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:05 AM Hubert Kario wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 21:25:26 CET internet-dra..
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:31 PM Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 January 2019 21:23:37 CET David Benjamin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:05 AM Hubert Kario wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 21:25:26 CET internet-dra...@ietf.org
> wrote:
> > > > There are also htmlized versio
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 21:23:37 CET David Benjamin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:05 AM Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 21:25:26 CET internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> > > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tl
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:05 AM Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 21:25:26 CET internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-grease-02
>
> while record_size_limit extension sends just one value,
On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 21:25:26 CET internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-grease-02
while record_size_limit extension sends just one value, it does specifically
allow the client to advertise higher valu
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Layer Security WG of the IETF.
Title : Applying GREASE to TLS Extensibility
Author : David Benjamin
Filename: draft-ietf-t
10 matches
Mail list logo
