Re: [TLS] RFC 8449 – DTLS 1.2 considerations

2020-07-16 Thread Achim Kraus
Hello Martin, thanks a lot for your answer! That helps very much to overcome my UDP confusion :-). best regards Achim Am 15.07.20 um 08:41 schrieb Martin Thomson: On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, at 22:41, Achim Kraus wrote: For me it seems, that an agreement about this message buffer size is still

Re: [TLS] RFC 8449 – DTLS 1.2 considerations

2020-07-15 Thread Martin Thomson
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, at 22:41, Achim Kraus wrote: > For me it seems, that an agreement about this message buffer size is > still missing. This is a question we dealt with in QUIC by limiting UDP datagram size rather than the record size (or packet size in QUIC terminology). In this case, the