This is a minor comment and purely aesthetic thing. Apologies for the lateness in noticing. Hopefully it's not too late:
In TLS 1.3, we dropped the "ecdh_" prefix on ecdh_x25519 and ecdh_x448 when we split signatures from NamedCurve/Group. The documents should probably match in naming one way or another. I think plain x25519 and x448 is tidier. X25519 already denotes the ECDH function, as opposed to curve25519 which is the curve. David
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
