Hi Ben,
thanks for the review.
On 03/29/2017 04:25 AM, Kaduk, Ben wrote:
> A few things I noticed while reading the draft to prepare for today’s
> session:
>
> We talk in a couple places about datagram protocols being
> “vulnerable” or “susceptible” to DoS attacks, which leads me to at
> least p
A few things I noticed while reading the draft to prepare for today’s session:
We talk in a couple places about datagram protocols being “vulnerable” or
“susceptible” to DoS attacks, which leads me to at least partially read that as
meaning that the protocol’s own service will be disrupted; as w
