Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread marcel partap
On 05/10/10 16:45, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > true still forks a child. > > What are you setting status-left and right to again? set -g status-left "[ #[fg=green]#H #[fg=white]]" set -g status-right "[ #[fg=magenta]#(true)#[default] ][ #[bold]#(true) #[fg=blue]#(true)#[default] ]" --

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread Nicholas Marriott
So with this the problem is that although you do not see a growing number of "true" programs running with ps -aelf, you do see tmux using an increasing amount of memory and CPU in eg top? On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:37:22PM +0200, marcel partap wrote: > On 05/10/10 16:45, Nicholas Marriott wrote:

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread marcel partap
On 07/10/10 22:05, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > So with this the problem is that although you do not see a growing > number of "true" programs running with ps -aelf, you do see tmux using > an increasing amount of memory and CPU in eg top? Naah, no issue whatsoever with #(true) instead command.

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread Nicholas Marriott
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 10:52:47PM +0200, marcel partap wrote: > On 07/10/10 22:05, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > >So with this the problem is that although you do not see a growing > >number of "true" programs running with ps -aelf, you do see tmux using > >an increasing amount of memory and CPU in e

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread marcel partap
On 07/10/10 23:50, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > ps -aelf, top|cat and tmux info K ZOMBIES!! > 0 Z empee584 27650 30440 0 80 0 - 0 exit 00:42 ?00:00:00 > [date] > 0 Z empee584 27652 30440 0 80 0 - 0 exit 00:42 ?00:00:00 > [date] > 0 Z empee584 27656 30440

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread Nicholas Marriott
so what was the status-left and status-right? is this tmux CVS HEAD? On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:44:47AM +0200, marcel partap wrote: > On 07/10/10 23:50, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > >ps -aelf, top|cat and tmux info > K ZOMBIES!! > > >0 Z empee584 27650 30440 0 80 0 - 0 exit 00:42 ?

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread marcel partap
> is this tmux CVS HEAD? yes. -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time c

Re: tmux acting as forkbomb with secondly update?

2010-10-07 Thread Nicholas Marriott
looks like it isn't collecting children, but i can't do much if you keep being selective in what questions you answer cutting out bits of ps output is useless because i can't see what the parent process is what libevent version are you using? it is possible that date takes so long on your box th