Re: tmux leaking socket descriptors under certain circumstances

2014-03-05 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-03-06 14:00, Jan Larres wrote: > Like I said I had to restart tmux so I can't test that at the moment, > but I could try to reproduce it. So when I do set -g status-right "#(sleep 30)" set -g status-interval 1 I see that tmux starts hoarding the sockets. So it possible that

Re: tmux leaking socket descriptors under certain circumstances

2014-03-05 Thread Jan Larres
On 06/03/14 12:44, Thomas Adam wrote: > On 5 March 2014 23:40, Jan Larres wrote: >> No, it happens without me doing anything. Now that I think about it the >> rate may be related to my statusline update interval (1 second), but >> unfortunately I can't test that any more as I had to restart tmux t

Re: tmux leaking socket descriptors under certain circumstances

2014-03-05 Thread Thomas Adam
On 5 March 2014 23:40, Jan Larres wrote: > On 06/03/14 00:32, Nicholas Marriott wrote: >> Do they increase as you use your run-shell M-hjkl bindings? > > No, it happens without me doing anything. Now that I think about it the > rate may be related to my statusline update interval (1 second), but >

Re: tmux leaking socket descriptors under certain circumstances

2014-03-05 Thread Jan Larres
On 06/03/14 00:32, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Do they increase as you use your run-shell M-hjkl bindings? No, it happens without me doing anything. Now that I think about it the rate may be related to my statusline update interval (1 second), but unfortunately I can't test that any more as I had t

Re: tmux leaking socket descriptors under certain circumstances

2014-03-05 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Do they increase as you use your run-shell M-hjkl bindings? Original message From: Jan Larres Date: 05/03/2014 04:23 (GMT+00:00) To: tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: tmux leaking socket descriptors under certain circumstances It just happened again, all the

[PATCH] Mouse wheel support v6

2014-03-05 Thread Marcel Partap
(+ some other changes regarding mouse implementation) - is u_int for i ok? - was there a valid reason to use bit shifts for MOUSE_EVENT_* constants? - ... --- input-keys.c| 18 +- server-fn.c | 1 + tmux.h | 23 +-- tty-keys.c | 27 +

Re: [tmux:tickets] #109 Periods no longer allowed in session names

2014-03-05 Thread Thomas Adam
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 03:19:48AM +, Xiong Chiamiov wrote: > > > > --- > > ** [tickets:#109] Periods no longer allowed in session names** > > **Status:** open > **Created:** Wed Mar 05, 2014 03:19 AM UTC by Xiong Chiamiov > **Last Updated:** Wed Mar 05, 2014 03:19 AM UTC > **Owner:** nobo

[tmux:tickets] #109 Periods no longer allowed in session names

2014-03-05 Thread Xiong Chiamiov
--- ** [tickets:#109] Periods no longer allowed in session names** **Status:** open **Created:** Wed Mar 05, 2014 03:19 AM UTC by Xiong Chiamiov **Last Updated:** Wed Mar 05, 2014 03:19 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody In tmux 1.8 and earlier, periods were valid in session names. I found this usefu