At 09:56 AM 1/17/02 +0200, you wrote:
well, minimal meaning 1c and minimalist meaning 2 (below) look pretty similar
to me, but as Tom says, the latter suggests intent. Then again, the fact that
it is in the title also does a fair job suggesting intent. Let's just steer
away from anything
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
ballot
[X] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5895.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfclere 02/01/17 00:57:35
Modified:webapp/java WarpConnector.java
Log:
Make the WARP connector's thread a daemon thread so that Tomcat shutdown
still works without a System.exit(0) call in Bootstrap.java.
(Ported from TC4.0 author: craigmcc).
Revision ChangesPath
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
Bojan
--
To
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of
the week (with
the binaries being released by monday). Here's the ballot:
ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[ ] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
+1 since you'll add the load-balancing
+1
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 release
I think it would be good to tag Tomcat 4.0.2 b2 at the end of
the week (with
the binaries
Hi,
I have some problems to run the Watchdog tests on mod_webapp and I think there
is a problem in watchdog:
For example:
+++
[java] [gtest] Unable to find the expected header: 'Content-Type:
text/plain' in the server's response.
[java] [gtest] The following headers were
Hi,
I have some problems to run the Watchdog tests on mod_webapp and I think
there
is a problem in watchdog:
For example:
+++
[java] [gtest] Unable to find the expected header:
'Content-Type:
text/plain' in the server's response.
[java] [gtest] The following headers
remm02/01/17 04:02:17
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session Tag:
tomcat_40_branch StandardManager.java
Log:
- Port patch.
- Set context class loader of thread used by the manager to expire sessions.
Revision ChangesPath
No
remm02/01/17 04:11:38
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Tag: tomcat_40_branch
Engine.java
Log:
- Port JVM route addition.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.6.2.1
remm02/01/17 04:11:47
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core Tag:
tomcat_40_branch StandardEngine.java
Log:
- Port JVM route addition.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
remm02/01/17 04:11:59
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session Tag:
tomcat_40_branch ManagerBase.java
Log:
- Port JVM route addition.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
remm02/01/17 04:17:16
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/connector/warp Tag:
tomcat_40_branch Constants.java
WarpConfigurationHandler.java WarpConnector.java
WarpRequest.java
remm02/01/17 04:26:42
Modified:catalina/src/conf Tag: tomcat_40_branch server.xml
Log:
- Enable jk by default.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.29.2.12 +0 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5899.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I have an idea for a fix. I'll have this implemented today.
-rl
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 06:56, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems to run the Watchdog tests on mod_webapp and I think
there
is a problem in watchdog:
For example:
+++
[java] [gtest] Unable
The Tomcat 3.3 rpms has been updated to release 2
to fix a problem with launchers configuration paths.
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3/rpms/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
Larry
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
+1 if the load balancing code gets in.
-0 without it ( since one of the most important functions of jk will
not work in 4.0.2 ).
I plan to port the jvmRoute patch. Is it enough ?
Yes, you have my +1 than. ( it should be a trivial thing,
remm02/01/17 07:38:40
Modified:lib Tag: tomcat_40_branch tomcat-ajp.jar
tomcat-util.jar
Log:
- Update util and AJP binaries.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.4 +569
Costin:
I'm not sure where to make these changes. In particular, I don't
know to which message(s) the jvmRoute information is attached
or how to extract it from the payload.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tom Drake wrote:
Costin:
I'm not sure where to make these changes. In particular, I don't
know to which message(s) the jvmRoute information is attached
or how to extract it from the payload.
The route is attached on each request. It could be sent only when the
jfclere 02/01/17 09:02:14
Modified:webapp/apache-1.3 mod_webapp.c
webapp/apache-2.0 mod_webapp.c
Log:
Change REMOTE_HOST to REMOTE_NAME as describes ServletRequest.getRemoteHost().
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +2 -2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5903.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5905.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5908.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am new to the list. I have been trying to use the JNDIRealm on our
System Architecture: Solaris 8 + OpenLDAP.
Since moving to a better encryption scheme on Solaris 8 is painful (and
mainly undocumented ;-)), we are using the basic crypt algorytthm.
Now I have seen a few issues with the
remm02/01/17 11:49:22
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Fix path separator (causes trouble with Cygwin).
Revision ChangesPath
1.55 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/build.xml
Index: build.xml
remm02/01/17 11:59:26
Modified:.build.properties.sample
Log:
- The JMX support can now be built and distributed with an alternate JMX
implmentation: OpenJMX. OpenJMX is a Sourceforge project which uses
the Apache license, so this should remove the redistribution
remm02/01/17 12:00:02
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
- The JMX support can now be built and distributed with an alternate JMX
implmentation: OpenJMX. OpenJMX is a Sourceforge project which uses
the Apache license, so this should remove the redistribution problems
remm02/01/17 12:01:02
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans
MBeanUtils.java ServerLifecycleListener.java
Log:
- The JMX support can now be built and distributed with an alternate JMX
implmentation: OpenJMX. OpenJMX is a Sourceforge
remm02/01/17 12:01:40
Added: lib openjmx.license
Log:
- Add license text for OpenJMX.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/lib/openjmx.license
Index: openjmx.license
remm02/01/17 12:02:16
Modified:webapps/admin build.xml
Log:
- The JMX support can now be built and distributed with an alternate JMX
implmentation: OpenJMX. OpenJMX is a Sourceforge project which uses
the Apache license, so this should remove the redistribution problems
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, obrand wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:38:58 -0800
From: obrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Talking about authentication
Hi,
I am new to the list. I have been trying to use the
Hi,
Tomcat 4 HEAD can now be built and run using an alternate JMX implementation
(with a much more open-source friendly license :)): OpenJMX
(www.open-jmx.org).
Note: OpenJMX 1.0b1 will not work with Tomcat, but a build from OpenJMX CVS
will
Note 2: The main JMX variable in build.properties
craigmcc02/01/17 12:16:53
Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml
Log:
Update the commented-out entry that enables MBean creation to reflect the
removal of the HttpAdaptor startup logic (which was proprietary to the
JMX RI implementation).
Revision ChangesPath
1.49
on 1/17/02 12:14 PM, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 4 HEAD can now be built and run using an alternate JMX implementation
(with a much more open-source friendly license :)): OpenJMX
(www.open-jmx.org).
Note: OpenJMX 1.0b1 will not work with Tomcat, but a build from
Excelent !
Costin
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Tomcat 4 HEAD can now be built and run using an alternate JMX implementation
(with a much more open-source friendly license :)): OpenJMX
(www.open-jmx.org).
Note: OpenJMX 1.0b1 will not work with Tomcat, but a build from
remm02/01/17 13:08:44
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 Constants.java
Added: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4
CoyoteConnector.java CoyoteProcessor.java
CoyoteRequest.java CoyoteResponse.java
Log:
ballot
[ ] +1 Make the release
[X] +0 Good idea, but I can't help
[ ] -0 Bad idea
[ ] -1 No, because:
/ballot
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
costin 02/01/17 13:17:02
Modified:jk/native/nt_service jk_nt_service.c
Log:
Fix the build ( was missing a param for jk_b_end ).
Added a bit of code to send a secret ( needed if secret is used ) and a bit
of code to deal with catalina's shutdown.
Revision Changes
costin 02/01/17 13:19:35
Modified:jk/native2 build.xml
Log:
Read a platform-specific build file first. This is usefull if you use the
same dir to build on 2 platforms ( which in turn is very usefull if you want
to check that some changes on one platform are not braking the
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, obrand wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:38:58 -0800
From: obrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Talking about authentication
Hi,
I am new to the list. I have been
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=361.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm02/01/17 16:46:24
Modified:.BUILDING.txt
Log:
- Update the build instructions to mention OpenJMX.
- Note: OpenJMX 1.0b1, despite what its release date may lead you to believe,
won't work. However, I submitted a few patches and nagged the dev list,
so the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5181.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
47 matches
Mail list logo
