DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10627] New: - incorrect documentation for class-loader-howto.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10627] - incorrect documentation for class-loader-howto.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10629] New: - include directive fails when referencing Parent Path within a WAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10629] - include directive fails when referencing Parent Path within a WAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardServer.java

remm2002/07/10 02:49:01 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardServer.java Log: - Make sure the global resources are correctly initialized even if there is no GlobalNamingResources element in the server.xml. Revision Change

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10611] - No Logger causes startup to fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Include directive in Tomcat4

This question is more suited for the User List. I believe test is setup as a "webapp" in your installation. Meaning: you should not include it in any kind of include directive. So <%@ include file = "/test/hello.html" %> should be <%@ include file = "/hello.html" %> or <%@ include fil

suggestion - viewing the classes Tomcat sees

Hi, I believe it would be usefull if the administrative application that comes with Tomcat 4.1.x offers an option to list all the classes Tomcat is seeing. It would help to configure jdbc drivers and solve "class not found" errors. Regards, Alexandre.

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-4.0

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml deploy-prepare: deploy-static: deploy:

RE: jar_cache files

Under AIX 4.3.3, when I do a "rm -rf /tmp/jar_cache*" the command don't failed. It is normal ??? This files aren't used after bootstrap of webapps ??? Arnaud > -Message d'origine- > De : Mark Prins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoye : mercredi 10 juillet 2002 15:27 > A : 'Tomcat Users

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

Probably a little late: > > > > [X] +1 I support the proposal, and will help implement it > > [ ] +0 I support the proposal > > [ ] -0 I do not support the proposal > > [ ] -1 I am against the proposal being implemented, because: > > Actually, I'm probably closer to a +0 for the next few week

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10608] - startup dumps core when using CATALINA_BASE

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10611] - No Logger causes startup to fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] New: - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c

mturk 2002/07/10 10:36:09 Modified:jk/native2/server/isapi jk_isapi_plugin.c Log: Fix the DllMain DLL_PROCESS_DETACH waitng for already closed thread. Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/isapi/jk_isapi_plugin.c In

Re: POST Problems Was: RE: [VOTE] 4.1.7 stability rating

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > I'm trying JK2 ( native& java ) of course, i've got this logs: It seems it is trying to connecto to localhost:8019 first. It reads the first part of the body - and the read fails. > [Sat Jul 06 01:16:36 2002] (error ) [jk_service_iis.c (202)] > jk

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c

mturk 2002/07/10 10:41:40 Modified:jk/native2/common jk_worker_jni.c Log: Fix the reporting of stderr and stdout redirection and, calling it if the methods are not set in the config. Revision ChangesPath 1.25 +19 -17jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/commo

Re: Use TreeControl in apps?

> I am no licensing expert, but I believe that the Apache license allows > you to use to any of the Tomcat source code (including the TreeControl). The license is not my problem (as we're using struts which is also a Jakarta-projekt ;-) ) but the documentation. I couldn't find any docu about th

RE: [4.1.6] New milestone release soon

Ok, I tried and I can't reproduce it. Costin, The problem has been fixed and works fine in 4.1.7. I couldn't get the thing to compile from CVS, so I had to wait for the 4.1.7 milestone. Thanks for your help. Dave. >I used an app doing big posts/gets - it all works fine for >me. > >If you ca

Re: Use TreeControl in apps?

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Carsten Burghardt wrote: > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:51:48 +0200 > From: Carsten Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Use TreeControl in apps? > > > I am no licensing expert, but I believ

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10629] - include directive fails when referencing Parent Path within a WAR

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10620] - Page won't compile when it has "too many" custom JSP tags

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: POST Problems Was: RE: [VOTE] 4.1.7 stability rating

> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 10 de julio de 2002 19:36 Was solved the last weekend, see my commits.. I was related to not detecting the last empty AJP packet in the Java part, the issue that ReadClient in IIS is a blocking call ( 60 s timeout with no setting,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10662] New: - getInitParameter returns null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10656] - Session Timeout incorrect for 0 in web.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10623] - JDBCRealm MD5 stops working after a while

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10623] - JDBCRealm with Digest stops working after a while

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10662] - getInitParameter returns null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

The final count for the vote is: +1s: 12 +0s: 2 The Tomcat 5.0 Proposal is now offcially adopted. I suggest that the emails related to 5.0 buisness be prefixed with [5.0]. I will post an email about the organization of the various branches and new repositories soon. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e

Re: webapp- who handles static content: Tomcat or Apache

Pier Fumagalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cute... You can have some... Visit your local tobacconist. > Anyhow, you'll see my reasoning when the article gets published. Few other > folks having the same problems we do (very high loads + servlets) don't have > the same problem as well It's ac

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10670] New: - Problem in JSP compilation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10623] - JDBCRealm lacks one DB commit, preventing sucessfull authentication under certain circunstances

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10623] - JDBCRealm lacks one DB commit, preventing sucessfull authentication under certain circunstances

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10671] New: - Major issues with jsp:param in jsp:include and jsp:forward

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9361] - jsp:param calls URLEncoder.encode() without null check

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: WELCOME to tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org

Hello! This is a page: <%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=Shift_JIS"%> <%@page session="true"%> <%= request.getRequestURI() %> <%= session.getId() %> So, guys, what do you think "request.getRequestURI()" method should return when cookies are switched OFF in browser and the request is ht

getRequestURI()

Hello! This is a page: <%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=Shift_JIS"%> <%@page session="true"%> <%= request.getRequestURI() %> <%= session.getId() %> So, guys, what do you think "request.getRequestURI()" method should return when cookies are switched OFF in browser and the request is ht

Re: getRequestURI()

Hum, it does look like the spec is a bit schizophrenic here. The ;jessionid= isn't part of the requestURI in section 4.4: It is important to note that, except for URL encoding differences between the request URI and the path parts, the following equation is always true: requestURI = contextPath

Re: getRequestURI()

Ah - now I feel stupid. I was thinking he was saying encodeURL didn't put it there. According to what your interpretation is he things getRequestURI doesn't get it back. :-/ I'll buy that - especially since you're quoting it from the docs ;-) *feels stupid* Is it a usage question rather than an i

Re: getRequestURI()

- Original Message - From: "Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:34 PM Subject: Re: getRequestURI() > Hum, it does look like the spec is a bit schizophrenic here. The > ;jessionid= isn't part of the requestU

RE: getRequestURI()

-Original Message- From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: getRequestURI() >> Ah - now I feel stupid. I was thinking he was saying encodeURL didn't >> put it there. According to what your interpretation is he things >> getRequestURI doesn't get

RE: getRequestURI()

HELLO! this is the discussion at Macromedia support forum: http://webforums.macromedia.com/jrun/messageview.cfm?catid=68&threadid=387534 could you please tell them that they may be wrong? I'm not good at citing specifications. with best wishes Alexander Kachanov -Original Message

Re: getRequestURI()

Look at what Bob posted. I'd listen to the spec before I listened to anyone else - hold that up to their nose. It's black and white. Alex Kachanov wrote: >-Original Message- >From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: getRequestURI() > >>>Ah - n