DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10852] - Patch: Add Connection Pooling to JNDIRealm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10852] New: - Patch: Add Connection Pooling to JNDIRealm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10850] New: - HttpUtils.getRequestURL omits port number

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: $ in JSP names

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:40:28 -0700 (PDT) > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: $ in JSP names >

No processor available - IIS and APJ13

Could someone give me a suggestion here? I'm having a problem that looks a lot like bug 5735 in the Apache Bug Database.. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5735 Basically, the server will suddenly start launching background threads until it reaches the maxProcessors parameter of

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans mbeans-descriptors.xml

amyroh 2002/07/15 14:05:20 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans mbeans-descriptors.xml Log: Add PersistentManager MBean info to mbeans-descripor.xml so it doesn't complain in case if you have PersistentManager. Patch submitted by Bob

Re: $ in JSP names

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > I think you and Craig are both right. So how about using a "_" instead of > a "$"? +1 ! Costin > > > > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:48:18 -0700 > > From: Arvind Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: $ in JSP names > > To: Tomcat Developers

Re: $ in JSP names

I think you and Craig are both right. So how about using a "_" instead of a "$"? > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 12:48:18 -0700 > From: Arvind Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: $ in JSP names > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content

Re: $ in JSP names

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:55:15 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: $ in JSP names

On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Kin-Man Chung wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:55:15 -0700 (PDT) > From: Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Kin-Man Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: $ in JSP names > > I totally

Re: $ in JSP names

I totally agree that the use of $ in a file name is a pain in the neck. In fact, I don't see the need for appending a "$jsp" at all. Currently we have the following mapping: jsp file name: foo.jsp class name: foo$jsp servelt file name: foo$jsp.java class file name

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tomcat 5.0 Proposal

Sorry for the late vote. I've been on vacation for last two weeks. But for the record, you have my +1. Thanks, Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: > After trying to address the concerns raised by the proposal draft, I > would like to call for a vote on it, now that the discussions have died > down. > >

Re: New branches and repositories

The new repositories (jakarta-servletapi-5, jakarta-tomcat-5, and jakarta-tomcat-catalina) have been set up with just a LICENSE file checked in. Craig On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:52:22 +0200 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomca

Re: [5.0] [VOTE] New branches and repositories

Sorry for the late vote. I've been on vacation last two weeks. ;-) > > > A) Servlet 2.4 & JSP 2.0 API > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-servletapi-5 > 2. [ ] Use the HEAD of jakarta-servletapi > 3. [ ] Other: > > B) Catalina 2.0 > 1. [X] Use new jakarta-tomcat-catalina > 2. [ ] Use new jakarta-tomcat-5

TC 4.1.7 write access on config dir

While packaging tomcat 4.1.7 rpm, and trying to make it as secure as possible with tomcat running as tomcat4:tomcat4 and owning log/work/temp dir), I see that it tries to write on conf/tomcat-users.xml.new or conf/jk2.properties, and to mimic apache httpd server conf is owned by root and in read-o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10789] - Setting DirectoryIndex of index.jsp does not get served by jk2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6279] - Resubmit to j_security_check mistakenly fetches a page of that name

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-4.0

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml deploy-prepare: deploy-static: deploy:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4829] - Automatic deployment of war files does not work properly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Missing data

Hello folks, I passed through a lot of "adventures" until I receive some logical consequence for receiving the so needed module of mod_jk.so for Solaris 8.0. It turned out that latest source versions of Tomcat4.x.x are only empty folders... And when I try to get some of archives like jakarta-tom

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10796] - reg. Tomcat performance

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10796] - reg. Tomcat performance

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10796] - reg. Tomcat performance

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Jar_cache* files bis

> -Message d'origine- > De : Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoye : vendredi 12 juillet 2002 18:16 > A : Tomcat Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: Jar_cache* files bis > > > > > On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > > Da