Re: FW: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: I'm going to repost this message once again because it seems Remy and Costin didn't bother reading it the first time and are now essentially agreeing to what I suggested below. What-EVER! Lol. Actually, you are proposing releasing multiple binaries because you don't wa

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

remm2002/12/10 23:51:48 Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Log: - Update release notes. Revision ChangesPath 1.37 +8 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java

remm2002/12/10 23:51:20 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java Log: - Fix the build. - Not using a canonical path may be ok. I need more testing though (don't port that to 4.1.x ;-) ). Revision ChangesPath 1.44 +1 -1 jakar

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15258] - ajp13 socket listens on localhost by default

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compilerCompiler.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: costin 2002/12/10 16:38:29 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java Log: Remove getCanonicalPath. This may not be a good idea, and I think would break Jasper on Windows. I'll revert it, if you don't mind. Remy -- To unsubscri

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelSocket.java

remm2002/12/10 23:34:25 Modified:jk/java/org/apache/jk/common ChannelSocket.java Log: - Restore old behavior: bind on all addresses by default. - Note: the file EOLs are correupted. Please fix it. Revision ChangesPath 1.29 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15251] - tomcat server serving blank pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: > > > Costin Manolache wrote: > >>Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: >> >> >> >>>Jon Scott Stevens wrote: >>> >>> >>> on 2002/12/10 3:15 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't mak

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15258] New: - ajp13 socket listens on localhost by default

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 4:59 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and run it in the JSR154-only container - if you want to. >>> >>> I thought that you need J

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Costin Manolache wrote: Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 3:15 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and run

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: > > > Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > >>on 2002/12/10 3:15 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>>Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily >>>precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and >>>run it in the JSR1

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 4:23 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. You need a distribution tailored for your use. Others may have > slightly different dists they need. Where does it stop? Would we end up > with 2-3 dozen different distributions? Tomcat can be used in so many > different

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

>>> Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily >>> precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and >>> run it in the JSR154-only container - if you want to. >> >> I thought that you need Jasper in order to run JSP's (compiled or not). >> > Yes, you need them sin

embedding tomcat SSL in java application

Hi, I am trying to embed a Tomcat inside our java application. I am able to start up tomcat on port 8080. However when i am trying to start up Tomcat with SSL on port 8443 i am unable to do so. I dont get any error on standard output being generated by tomcat.However when i go to the browser an

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java

costin 2002/12/10 16:38:29 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java Log: Remove getCanonicalPath. Revision ChangesPath 1.43 +1 -2 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Compiler.java Index: Compiler.j

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15256] New: - problem with jk/build.xml "isset" element lines 383 & 389

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 3:23 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then we only have one download (perhaps large) but with a variety of different installs. Right now, I have to specially distribute Tomcat for Scarab. Instead, I want one small download that I can point

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 3:15 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and run it in the JSR154-only container - if you want to. I thought t

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 3:15 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily > precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and > run it in the JSR154-only container - if you want to. I thought that you need Jasper in order to

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 3:23 PM, "Glenn Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then we only have one download (perhaps large) but with a variety > of different installs. Right now, I have to specially distribute Tomcat for Scarab. Instead, I want one small download that I can point people at and tell them t

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Why not have one distribution of Tomcat but with an ant installer with different targets. The ant installer builds a layout of files for running tomcat based on the target. Then we only have one download (perhaps large) but with a variety of different installs. Some of the options could grab any

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

I don't know why people have the impression that they need support or some special motivation when voting on a proposal. Yes - your admin tool argument doesn't make sense. You can easily precompile the admintool ( and we should do it anyway ) and run it in the JSR154-only container - if you wan

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 2:52 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What Remy and Costin are agreeing on is one tomcat release that includes > multiple profiles - so people can run "jsr154" or "minimal" or "default" > or "all". (repeat) Which is what I already suggested. > I don't know why

Re: FW: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > I'm going to repost this message once again because it seems Remy and > Costin didn't bother reading it the first time and are now essentially > agreeing to what I suggested below. > > What-EVER! What-EVER to you. Reading your posts is not my favorite activity - for t

FW: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

I'm going to repost this message once again because it seems Remy and Costin didn't bother reading it the first time and are now essentially agreeing to what I suggested below. What-EVER! -jon -- Forwarded Message From: Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List"

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java

costin 2002/12/10 13:38:01 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java Log: Port the fixes to main. This adds more debug info on compiler errors. Revision ChangesPath 1.42 +16 -2 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jaspe

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties

luehe 2002/12/10 13:33:36 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspDocumentParser.java jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties Log: Fixed dynamic attribute bug for XML syntax.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java

costin 2002/12/10 13:29:59 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: tomcat_4_branch Compiler.java Log: A small fix that may help resolving the ant test failures and debug the compile errors related with javac. In case of a compile err

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15251] New: - tomcat server serving blank pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15245] - 'milliseconds' should be localized.in Admin webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/connector connector.jsp

amyroh 2002/12/10 12:43:54 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_en.properties ApplicationResources_es.properties ApplicationResources_ja.properties webap

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/connector connector.jsp

amyroh 2002/12/10 12:41:48 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_en.properties ApplicationResources_es.properties ApplicationResources_ja.properties webap

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15249] New: - FileLogger timestamp set to false or null is ignored

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

iplanet4.1 + ajp13 + tomcat 4.0.x

I am trying to integrate iplanet4.1 + ajp13 + tomcat 4.0.x on a solaris platform. I cant find any documentation on this on the jakarta.apache.org site. The only document I found was for the windows platform. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/neshowto.html Can someone pleas

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 tomcat.nsi

remm2002/12/10 11:40:08 Modified:.tomcat.nsi Log: - Fix uninstaller logic. Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +2 -6 jakarta-tomcat-5/tomcat.nsi Index: tomcat.nsi === RCS file: /home/cvs/

[PATCH] mod_jk - chroot and user issues

I recently created a port of mod_jk-1.2.1 for OpenBSD and needed to make some minor patches to mod_jk. OpenBSD 3.2 has Apache 1.3.26 configured as ServerType standalone, to chroot to /var/www and run as user www by default. This combination requires a few minor patches so that mod_jk will continue

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans ServerLifecycleListener.java

remm2002/12/10 10:49:06 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans ServerLifecycleListener.java Log: - Fix incorrect servlet context initialization if the admin webapp recieves a stop/start. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +8 -5

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Costin Manolache wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Yes but add the ability to activate/include modules, which is the Costin idea ;) Actually - I think it is your idea :-) ( well, now it makes a lot of sense - I'm in "how didn't I think of it" mode ). That means I will drop my minimal proposal, or

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 2002/12/10 7:30 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes - Jon will not be happy ( as far as I know Jon ) if jasper.jar >> is anywhere in the distribution, even if it is not used. > > If Jasper is in there, then it isn't a (repeat) 'minimal JSR 154

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

+1 Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a committer on the Tomcat project. Filip has written the clustering code that was committed recently in the Tomcat 5 CVS, and is willing to maintain it, as well as continuing to improve it (including supporting large clusters)

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Martin Algesten wrote: >> This is the soundest idea I've heard so far. Multiple distributions >> sounds like disaster area to me. I currently think it is hard enough for >> a new user to decide Tomcat3/Tomcat4.x/Tomcat5 when presented with the >> choices. If there in additi

RE: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

+1 Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:17 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik > > > I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a > committer on > the Tomcat project. Filip

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Henri Gomez wrote: > Yes but add the ability to activate/include modules, which is > the Costin idea ;) Actually - I think it is your idea :-) ( well, now it makes a lot of sense - I'm in "how didn't I think of it" mode ). That means I will drop my minimal proposal, or at least rewrite it to b

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans NamingResourcesMBean.java mbeans-descriptors.xml

remm2002/12/10 10:12:51 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans NamingResourcesMBean.java mbeans-descriptors.xml Log: - Fix bug 15239. - Remove useless parameter. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +6 -7 jakarta-tomcat-catali

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/resources SaveResourceLinkAction.java

remm2002/12/10 10:12:40 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin/resources SaveResourceLinkAction.java Log: - Fix bug 15239. - Remove useless parameter. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +6 -8 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15245] New: - 'milliseconds' should be localized.in Admin webapp

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15239] - Creating new uses TYPE attribute value for NAME attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

remm2002/12/10 10:02:50 Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Log: - Update release notes. Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +5 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans NamingResourcesMBean.java

remm2002/12/10 09:56:57 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans NamingResourcesMBean.java Log: - Fix creation of resource links. - Fix bug 15239. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +6 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 7:30 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes - Jon will not be happy ( as far as I know Jon ) if jasper.jar > is anywhere in the distribution, even if it is not used. If Jasper is in there, then it isn't a (repeat) 'minimal JSR 154 only distribution.' -jon -- Stud

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 2:36 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes but add the ability to activate/include modules, which is > the Costin idea ;) Nope...Read my message with the ascii chart in it... -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15239] New: - Creating new uses TYPE attribute value for NAME attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 9/12/02 23:58 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It >> should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made >> and was voted on tomcat-dev. > > I swear that _LOVE_ my

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

Remy Maucherat wrote: > I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a committer on > the Tomcat project. Filip has written the clustering code that was > committed recently in the Tomcat 5 CVS, and is willing to maintain it, > as well as continuing to improve it (including supporting large > clusters). F

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Henri Gomez wrote: > The idea being to provide a minimal tomcat binary and > many external modules which will be linked at runtime if > present, Apache 2.0 does it that way, why could we do the > same. Another solution can be seen in jboss. They do pack all the components ( or almost ), but also

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5735] - HTTP connector running out of processors under heavy load

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0 RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

remm2002/12/10 07:00:52 Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Log: - Compile list of changes since 4.1.16. Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +46 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina gump.xml

rubys 2002/12/10 06:12:41 Modified:.gump.xml Log: Add dependency on javagroups. (Is this descriptor being maintained, or should it move back to jakarta-alexandria?) Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +1 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/gump.xml Index: gump.xm

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-catalina

Index: gump.xml === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/gump.xml,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 gump.xml --- gump.xml8 Dec 2002 17:01:44 - 1.10 +++ gump.xml10 Dec 2002 13:57:51 - @@ -69,6

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-catalina

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml deploy-prepare: [mkdir] Created dir: /ho

Re: [VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

Remy Maucherat wrote: I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a committer on the Tomcat project. Filip has written the clustering code that was committed recently in the Tomcat 5 CVS, and is willing to maintain it, as well as continuing to improve it (including supporting large clusters). Filip i

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java

remm2002/12/10 05:33:22 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java Log: - Part of the manager patch wasn't reverted (I don't know if it's a problem or not in the real world; just playing it safe). Revision Changes

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3888] - WebappClassLoader: Lifecycle error : CL stopped

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapper.java

remm2002/12/10 04:47:05 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core StandardWrapper.java Log: - Mark servlets as unavailable when the wrapper is stopped (bug 15077). Revision ChangesPath 1.44 +9 -5 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalin

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster Constants.java JGCluster.java JGManager.java LocalStrings.properties package.html ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.java SerializablePrincipal.java SessionMessage.java

remm2002/12/10 04:44:05 Removed: catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster Constants.java JGCluster.java JGManager.java LocalStrings.properties package.html ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.java

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules - Imported sources

remm2002/12/10 04:42:13 Log: - Moving cluster features to a "modules" folder. Status: Vendor Tag: ASF Release Tags: initial N jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/Constants.java N jakarta-tomcat-catalina/modules/cluster/sr

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.java SerializablePrincipal.java SessionMessage.java

remm2002/12/10 04:39:18 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.java SerializablePrincipal.java SessionMessage.java Log: - Code cleanup part 2. Revision ChangesPath

[PATCH] More Content-Type problems with 304 responses (Tomcat3.3.1)

Hello... I had a problem a while ago with If-Modified-Since responses 304 always set the Content-Type to "text/plain" which consequently pollutes web-caches that updates their cached entries with the new Content-Type. E.g. if we request a GIF, the content type in the cache will the first time be s

RE: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 December 2002 10:55 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 ) > > I really cannot believe I could agree with you on something ;-) > > Remy > I might have stro

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Martin Algesten wrote: This is the soundest idea I've heard so far. Multiple distributions sounds like disaster area to me. I currently think it is hard enough for a new user to decide Tomcat3/Tomcat4.x/Tomcat5 when presented with the choices. If there in addition to that is "Tomcat4 lite", "Tomca

RE: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

This is the soundest idea I've heard so far. Multiple distributions sounds like disaster area to me. I currently think it is hard enough for a new user to decide Tomcat3/Tomcat4.x/Tomcat5 when presented with the choices. If there in addition to that is "Tomcat4 lite", "Tomcat4 all" "Tomcat5 lite"..

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 12:49 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - Who will be the release managers for the 'alternative distributions', may be Jon is candidate ? I already volunteered to manage the distribution that I propose. I have been doing distributions of ser

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 12:53 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The idea being to provide a minimal tomcat binary and many external modules which will be linked at runtime if present, Apache 2.0 does it that way, why could we do the same. You are repeating my ideas

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Like the httpd, I'd prefer having a full distribution of all safe (yes, Jasper is safe) and generally useful modules. Experienced users can tweak the configuration to their likin

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

on 2002/12/10 1:46 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so just take the tomcat core and don't install/activate > the jasper module. Exactly. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://studioz.tv/ -- To unsubscribe

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is one big huge difference... Modules are DSOs, if you don't enable them in your httpd.conf, they don't get loaded, they don't get used Disabling all of them can be done

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like the httpd, I'd prefer having a full distribution of all safe (yes, > Jasper is safe) and generally useful modules. Experienced users can > tweak the configuration to their liking, and it is easy t

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 10/12/02 8:57 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> Pier (a _user_ now) > > And that's sad. Not apparently, as I am the reason why noone picked up Tomcat 4 :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I remember perfectly, and this Tomcat-HA was a complete joke. You > proposed a new implementation of the Catalina classes, which doesn't > make sense given the current Tomcat state That's what I was a

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/10 1:19 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What Jon and Pier want is a minimal distribution of Tomcat 5. No. What I want is a distribution of a JSR 154 container with nothing more than the RI of JSR 154. Period. Ok, so just take the tomcat core

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 1:00 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All I'm seeing is that I shouldn't pay attention to your posts (I should > have learnt that a while ago, I guess) ;-) Is that good enough for you ? As Pier says: What-EVER! > Sorry, no. You should try to give users as few

Re: Minimal or Modular it's up to you

on 2002/12/10 1:19 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What Jon and Pier want is a minimal distribution of > Tomcat 5. No. What I want is a distribution of a JSR 154 container with nothing more than the RI of JSR 154. Period. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11t

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 12:53 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The idea being to provide a minimal tomcat binary and > many external modules which will be linked at runtime if > present, Apache 2.0 does it that way, why could we do the > same. You are repeating my ideas that I have already sa

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/10 12:49 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Who will be the release managers for the 'alternative distributions', > may be Jon is candidate ? I already volunteered to manage the distribution that I propose. I have been doing distributions of servlet containers since you

Minimal or Modular it's up to you

There was many noise these days about making another release of tomcat (the minimal one covering only JSR154), and another proposal to make a modular Tomcat. It may be because my mother language is french, but I still didn't understand why Tomcat commiters didn't find an arrangement on these 2 pro

[VOTE] New committer: Filip Hanik

I'd like to nominate Filip Hanik as a committer on the Tomcat project. Filip has written the clustering code that was committed recently in the Tomcat 5 CVS, and is willing to maintain it, as well as continuing to improve it (including supporting large clusters). Filip is one of the authors of

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/9 8:21 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: People cannot agree on everything. Here, we're talking about relatively minor topics. This issue won't end up in a division of the community, but rather in one additional binary distribution based on the

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP As I said 6 or so months ago... That "thing" is a securit

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/9 7:32 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What about using a minimal tomcat core with plugged modules to give access to jsp/jmx ? Will make both Costin, and Jon happy and let us have only one distribution with clear indication in server.xml on

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2002/12/9 7:27 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd really like to avoid the proliferation of too many distributions. I don't agree with that. There is nothing wrong with giving users choices. There is many things something wrong with many distrib

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15201] - ClassCastException in JkCoyoteHandler.action() with SSL

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyotePrincipal.java CoyoteAdapter.java

remm2002/12/10 00:44:05 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyoteAdapter.java Added: coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat5 CoyotePrincipal.java Log: - Port patch. - Some code seemed to be missing. Revision ChangesPat

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteAdapter.java

remm2002/12/10 00:43:21 Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat4 CoyoteAdapter.java Log: - getCoyoteRequest needs to be used here (JK expects a Coyote Request, not the facade). - Fix bug 15201. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +6 -5 jakarta-tomcat-

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 23:58 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made and was voted on tomcat-dev. I swear that _LOVE_ my mates... My

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: OK, seems I don't have any supports to stay with my -1 (seems nobody care about the AdminTool argument :-)). So I will change my mind and vote 0. You don't have to justify anything for that vote, you know ;-) BTW, all of Pier arguments are just false. Don't get fool

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 23:51 "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ehemm... With 24 pages of vulnerability notes? Ha.. Hahaha Hahahaha! :-) Correction to self... Not 24 pages... 24 notes... (Ok, I have an eyesight test tomorrow morning at 10:20 in SOHO... I know, I know..