This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-01-26/jakarta-tomcat-catalina.html
Buildfile: build.xml
deploy-prepare:
[mkdir] Created dir:
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/2003-01-26/jakarta-tomcat-jk-ant.html
Buildfile: build.xml does not exist!
Build failed
--
To unsubscribe,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 7:05 PM
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml
larryi 2003/01/25 19:05:33
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Update commons-logging default version and add
I'll take Sam's suggestions (probably tomorrow, since it is a bit late for
me to get it right now :).
It's a bit of a gray area. Tomcat 3.3 should gump-build fine as is. As
long as you are using the HEAD commons-modeler, then you have no problems
building the HEAD j-t-c. The branch is for the
I'm assuming that this was actually voted on in some list (certainly not
this one). I'd just like to add my -0 vote (only because a -1 is pointless
now :). The 3.3 branch needs to have a 3.3.2 release, and IMHO, a 3.3.1a
release is just a waste of time.
- Original Message -
From: Larry
This was the quickest way to deal with a security
vulnerability that was discussed on tomcat-committers.
At the time Tomcat 3.3.x wasn't building and the
last good build doesn't pass one of the internal
tests. Also, I haven't had time to clean out
the old mod_jk content and to other clean up that
glenn 2003/01/26 10:55:51
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Compiler.java
Log:
Dereference those objects which are only used during the generation
of the java class from the JSP source or used during the javac
glenn 2003/01/26 11:00:19
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
Update release notes
Revision ChangesPath
1.52 +6 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
glenn 2003/01/26 11:00:58
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java
Log:
Dereference those objects which are only used during the generation
of the java class from the JSP source or used during the javac compile.
This should reduce the memory
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15845.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Although bug 15845 is listed as being for 4.1.19, it looks like it
affected Jasper2 even before that -- or am I reading the commit
message wrong?
Thanks,
Adi
On 26 Jan 2003 19:00:19 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
glenn 2003/01/26 11:00:19
Modified: . RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt Log: Update
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.java [line 1957] uses
java.io.File.toURI() which is in java 1.4 and not in java 1.3.
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/docs/api/java/io/File.html#toURI()
All the discussions I have seen so far with respect to tomcat 5 and jdk
1.4 state that tomcat 5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9931.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You read it correctly. AFAIK, all previous versions of jasper
held on to objects which it no longer needed after a JSP compile.
Glenn
Aditya wrote:
Although bug 15845 is listed as being for 4.1.19, it looks like it
affected Jasper2 even before that -- or am I reading the commit
message wrong?
Hi:
I am trying to get ajp to work with other jsp/servlet engines other then
tomcat. Right now I am working on IIS with isapi_redirector2.dll and
listening on port 8009 with my own ajp listener. The problem is somehow the
dll never calls to port 8009 when I am accessing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16445.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
22 matches
Mail list logo
