DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23805.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21105.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeff Tulley wrote:
Nothing yet found on the NetWare side, though we have not yet pounded it
hard. 4.1.28 has been only better than 4.1.27 as far as I'm concerned.
I'd be desirous to see a vote and (hopefully) have it determined to be
stable.
Well, my vote hasn't been very popular (as usual, but
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21105.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello, Tomcat committers,
This mail includes an Internationalized/Localized version of Tomcat 5
top page. I have already created English/Japanese message resources. I
hope someone will create message resources for other languages.
Note: This requires JSTL 1.1.
Kazuhiro Kazama ([EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23970.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23970.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Andy Armstrong wrote:
UK time here. Still trying to get Ethereal to trace local (intra
machine) traffic. I'm not around tomorrow so it may be Monday before
there's anything to dissect.
Monday came and went. Is anyone else interested in the detail of what
follows (analysis of packet dumps) or
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
UK time here. Still trying to get Ethereal to trace local (intra
machine) traffic. I'm not around tomorrow so it may be Monday before
there's anything to dissect.
Monday came and went. Is anyone else interested in the detail of what
follows
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
That's as far as I've got and I'm just wondering whether it'd be nice
to write an Ethereal packet dissector for AJP 1.3 or whether that
would count as displacement activity. Is there anything specific I
should be looking for Henri?
There is allready an ajp13 disector for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23974.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
That's as far as I've got and I'm just wondering whether it'd be nice
to write an Ethereal packet dissector for AJP 1.3 or whether that
would count as displacement activity. Is there anything specific I
should be looking for Henri?
There is allready
Henri Gomez wrote:
The ajp13 disector was introduced in ethereal some months ago
And I now have a copy of it rather than last year's model :)
Anyway, the conversation looks like this in summary and a (naive)
analysis of the contents of the packets doesn't yield anything obvious.
- FORWARD
Hi,
The catalina.sh/bat script still include the embedded option (BTW no
longer works since the Embedded class is not in bootstrap.jar). Do we
still want to support that option or should I remove it from the script?
Thanks,
-- Jeanfrancois
Jean-Francois Arcand wrote:
Hi,
The catalina.sh/bat script still include the embedded option (BTW no
longer works since the Embedded class is not in bootstrap.jar). Do we
still want to support that option or should I remove it from the script?
I think it should be removed: embedded is done
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
The ajp13 disector was introduced in ethereal some months ago
And I now have a copy of it rather than last year's model :)
Anyway, the conversation looks like this in summary and a (naive)
analysis of the contents of the packets doesn't yield anything
Henri Gomez wrote:
- FORWARD REQUEST
- SEND HEADERS
- SEND BODY CHUNK
- END RESPONSE (REUSEP:1)
OK, that's enough of a difference to explain what I'm seeing...
May be something to do with chunk encoding which has been modified
in ajp13/jk (after your works on domino I think)
Well so far I've
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
- FORWARD REQUEST
- SEND HEADERS
- SEND BODY CHUNK
- END RESPONSE (REUSEP:1)
OK, that's enough of a difference to explain what I'm seeing...
May be something to do with chunk encoding which has been modified
in ajp13/jk (after your works on domino I
Andy Armstrong wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
- FORWARD REQUEST
- SEND HEADERS
- SEND BODY CHUNK
- END RESPONSE (REUSEP:1)
OK, that's enough of a difference to explain what I'm seeing...
May be something to do with chunk encoding which has been modified
in ajp13/jk (after your works on domino I
Henri Gomez wrote:
Nope, there was works on the chunked and header len in ajp13 java side
which are probably not in old domino code...
Take a look at what is on IIS which should be at right level
OK, thanks :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Tagish
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well so far I've taken the old Domino Connector source and built it
against the latest version of ajp13/jk (as of last week). Should that
not 'just work'?
BTW, we're now focusing on jk2, so what about working on jk2 for domino.
The requirement will be having apr for your box
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23976.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry for the late reply on this. I'd also like to help out with
mod_jk2 and this move to apr. Mostly for the sake of the NetWare
platform, though I need to understand the Linux connectors well as well.
Let me know where I can be of service. I have a little experience with
the connectors,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23895.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23895.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23980.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23895.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfarcand2003/10/21 17:28:44
Modified:catalina/src/bin catalina.sh catalina.bat
Log:
Remove supports for Embedded options.
Revert if you still use it (and make it work againt :-) ).
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +1 -13
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21763.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23502.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi, tomcat committers.
I have made a patch to improve some tomcat documents.
Could anyone apply it?
Changes:
- Fixes some typos.
- Fixes broken links, Commons DBCP javadoc and
Tyrex site, in jndi-datasource-examples-howto.xml.
- Writes utf-8 encoding values into a sample xsl file of
35 matches
Mail list logo
