Re: [PATCH] jakarta-servletapi-5: fix description

2003-10-29 Thread Yuta Yoshida
The attached file is to update the servlet2.4 deployment descriptor schema jsr154/src/share/dtd/web-app_2_4.xsd Update the 'year' in the copyright thank you, yutaka yoshida Sun Microsystems, Inc. Index: jsr154/src/share/dtd/web-app_2_4.xsd ===

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24238] New: - Tomcat WIndows service very slow to stop (delay > 1 minute)

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler ELFunctionMapper.java ELNode.java ELParser.java

2003-10-29 Thread kinman
kinman 2003/10/29 18:39:48 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler ELFunctionMapper.java ELNode.java ELParser.java Log: - Add some javacdocs. Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +33 -4 jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apac

Addition of roles in CoyotePrincipal similiar to GenericPrincipal

2003-10-29 Thread Robert Biernat
Hi, I'm not sure wether this has been discussed before, but I'm wondering wether theres any reason why the CoyotePrincipal class couldnt be extended to maintain a list of roles, similiar to what is now done with the GenericPrincipal in the catalina realm package. I have a scenario at the moment w

Serious firewall problem with Tomcat / AJ13 /IIS, request parameters disappear in POSTs ????

2003-10-29 Thread Markus Rahlff
Hallo, I have a strange problem: Im using Tomcat 4.27 connected to an IIS 6.0 via AJ13 connector. Everythings works fine, until I use a Norton Firewall. If I switch on the privacy setting, which strips the referer from the request, no request-parameter in POST-request reaches tomcat. ( No pro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24233] - Loggers broken?

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24233] - Loggers broken?

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24233] New: - Loggers broken?

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23745] - "jsp.error.unterminated.tag" received when doing struts tags - improve error messages for misbuilt tags!

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Halstead, Chris
Maybe it's just me, but I'm seeing some wierdness with Loggers in 5.0.14. Nested Loggers seem to be broken somehow. An out-of-the-box install normally creates a localhost_admin log on startup, but 5.0.14 does not (even though the admin app context descriptor defines it). I've also been able t

Re: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Kin-Man Chung
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:32:58 +0100 > From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [VOTE] New builds > To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > > > > Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? > [X] Yes Jasper seems solid. > [ ] No > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10903] - Unbalanced tags do not generate compile time error

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/service service.jsp

2003-10-29 Thread kinman
kinman 2003/10/29 13:57:17 Modified:webapps/admin/host host.jsp webapps/admin/service service.jsp Log: - Don't comment out custom tags with . Use <%-- and --%> instead. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +2 -0 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/host/h

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties

2003-10-29 Thread kinman
kinman 2003/10/29 13:53:43 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties Log: - Fix 10903: Generate errors for unbalanced end tags. Revision Changes

Re: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Amy Roh
> > Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? > [X] Yes > [ ] No > > > > Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? > [X] Yes > [ ] No > Amy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 5.0.X Benchmarks Was: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread David Rees
On Wed, October 29, 2003 1at 1:41 am, Mladen Turk wrote: > > AFAICT the 5.0.14 is production quality version, much more stable and > faster, at least for the applications I'm using. > Just upgraded the application (ESRI ArcIMS) from IIS/Jrun to Tomcat > 5.0.14, and it's lot faster. > I'll post some

RE: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat > > > > Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > > > > Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? > [x] Yes > [ ] No > > AFAICT the 5.0.14 is production quality version, much more stable and faster, at least for the applications I'm using. Just up

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24226] New: - Proposition for new Preprocessor for jsp

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Jean-Francois Arcand
Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? [X] Yes [ ] No I've ran the Servlet/JSP tcks on 5.0.14 and they all passes (with and without SecurityManager). Validation is still working (wow 1 month without breaking...do not update xerces ;-) ) -- Jeanfrancois ---

[Vote] New Builds

2003-10-29 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, Sorry I deleted the original vote thread. Tomcat 4.1.29 [X] Stable Tested 4.1.29, no problems for me ;) Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprieta

Re: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Glenn Nielsen
Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? [X] Yes [ ] No Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --

Re: [VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread jean-frederic clere
Remy Maucherat wrote: Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? [X] Yes [ ] No Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Help for jasper2/JWSDP1.3 - how to get rid of log4j dependecy?

2003-10-29 Thread Hristo Stoyanov
Hi all- I am using Tomcat (as part of JSWDP1.3) and would like to pre-compile my JSPs with Jasper2 in my Ant script. Jasper2 requires "commons-logging.jar", which, for some unexplicable reason, starts asking for classes in "log4j.jar" (why is this idiotic behaviour of "commons-logging.jar"?) . I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23745] - "jsp.error.unterminated.tag" received when doing struts tags - improve error messages for misbuilt tags!

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20405] - "Unterminated tag"-error: say which one

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[VOTE] New builds

2003-10-29 Thread Remy Maucherat
Release 4.1.29 as Stable ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Release 5.0.14 as Beta ? [ ] Yes [ ] No Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jk2/apr

2003-10-29 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : Mladen Turk a écrit : From: Henri Gomez Ding/Dong, What's the status of jk2 use APR ? Mladen did you are still with works in progress ? I'm in a few deadline loops, again ;-). So if nobody beets me before weekend I'll commit the needed changes. Ok we could until Mon

Re: jk2/apr

2003-10-29 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit : From: Henri Gomez Ding/Dong, What's the status of jk2 use APR ? Mladen did you are still with works in progress ? I'm in a few deadline loops, again ;-). So if nobody beets me before weekend I'll commit the needed changes. Ok we could until Monday :-) -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24197] - adding an extra slash in a mod_jk url circumvents tomcat (form) login authentication

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24206] - Error while starting up tomcat server

2003-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu