DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28196.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28196.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From Costin Manolache
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TC evolment
That's probably why I tought let's integrate PHP was an
April 1 joke :-).
You were wrong.
I thought that MS-Sun agreement was a April fools joke too :).
If Mladen is serious
Hi to all,
I've got problems with some highly stressed applications using jk or jk2
and tomcat 3.3.2 (same thing with TC 5.0.x).
I see many errors like these in log :
in TC 3.3.2 and 5.0.19 :
Mar 19, 2004 1:47:51 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
INFO: Unknown message 0
in 5.0.19
Hi,
I opened Bug 28161 last week. I found out yesterday, that the problem comes
from using the SmartQueue together with DeltaManager and asynchronous
replication (see Bug-Report for details).
What are the plans now? If I knew, that a fix will take several days I might
substitute the SmartQueue
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I've got problems with some highly stressed applications using jk or jk2
and tomcat 3.3.2 (same thing with TC 5.0.x).
I see many errors like these in log :
in TC 3.3.2 and 5.0.19 :
Mar 19, 2004 1:47:51 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke
INFO: Unknown
hgomez 2004/04/05 23:59:54
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote RequestInfo.java
Log:
Avoid NPE.
It appears at the end of some stress tests.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +4 -2
hgomez 2004/04/06 00:01:08
Modified:coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote RequestInfo.java
Log:
Tab policies
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +2 -2
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/RequestInfo.java
Index: RequestInfo.java
hgomez 2004/04/06 00:29:48
Modified:.build.properties.sample
Log:
Correct jmxtools.jar for this example bp
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat/build.properties.sample
Index: build.properties.sample
hgomez 2004/04/06 00:12:31
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
We're now on 3.3.3-dev
Revision ChangesPath
1.204 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28129.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28221.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28219.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28196.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm -0 on this. The classes modified are all internal to the Tomcat 5.x
CoyoteConnector, so there is no good reason to make them public.
The way that Coyote is designed, this should always be unnecessary. The way
to build a new connector is to define a new ProtocolHandler that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28123.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28154.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I've got problems with some highly stressed applications using jk or jk2
and tomcat 3.3.2 (same thing with TC 5.0.x).
I see many errors like these in log :
in TC 3.3.2 and 5.0.19 :
Mar 19, 2004 1:47:51 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I've got problems with some highly stressed applications using jk or jk2
and tomcat 3.3.2 (same thing with TC 5.0.x).
I see many errors like these in log :
in TC 3.3.2 and 5.0.19 :
Mar 19, 2004 1:47:51 PM
Norton AntiVirus gelöscht1.txt
Description: plain/text
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no, smart queue does not belong with the delta manager. it could never work
that way, and never will :)
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TC Cluster: does SmartQueue fit into
attachment: ceyrisgppa.bmp-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
I'm -0 on this. The classes modified are all internal to the Tomcat 5.x
CoyoteConnector, so there is no good reason to make them public.
The way that Coyote is designed, this should always be unnecessary.
The way
to build a new connector is to define
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28234.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mmanders2004/04/06 09:40:57
Modified:jk/native build.xml
Log:
Updated build rev for NetWare modules.
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/build.xml
Index: build.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28236.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28147.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
funkman 2004/04/06 10:58:59
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
Allow disable tag pooling for ant task (and command line option)
also detabbed
Revision ChangesPath
1.69 +97 -85
- Original Message -
From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: Problems with stress tested apps
Henri Gomez wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I've got problems with some highly
subscribe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Is there a way to implement custom session tracking at the container
level?
I'm trying to figure out how to implement a custom session tracking
method. I have a legacy client that interacts with a set of cgi scripts
and I'd like to port those scripts to servlets. I'm running into a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28236.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ok, I decided to modify the Http11Processor, since the SSL trick is
kindof too hacky for my taste. It sets the attribute, and it's fine now.
Another issue came up though with flushing the OutputStream - and this
is something unrelated to the previous conversation.
So in
I plan to tag 5.0.22 tomorrow. Any objections ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sounds good!
Filip
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:48 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: 5.0.22 tag ?
I plan to tag 5.0.22 tomorrow. Any objections ?
Rémy
remm2004/04/06 16:05:39
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
BodyContentImpl.java
Log:
- Bug 28236: when reallocating, make the buffer grow faster (512 bytes at a
time was not sufficient).
- Remove main method.
Revision Changes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28236.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello
I have a problem reading stacktrace info when Tomcat throws an exception caused by a
servlet or a class calld by a servlet
I have my classes compiled into in the . WEB-INF/classes directory and (so far) I
use no war or jar.
When an exception is thrown the stacktrace does not show line
Hans Verschoor wrote:
I have a problem reading stacktrace info when Tomcat throws an exception
caused by a servlet or a class calld by a servlet
I have my classes compiled into in the . WEB-INF/classes directory and
(so far) I use no war or jar.
When an exception is thrown the stacktrace
luehe 2004/04/06 19:27:47
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardContext.java
Log:
Fixed problem where when replacing global JspServlet with
webapp-specific one, the wrapper for the global JspServlet (which had
already been stopped
luehe 2004/04/06 19:31:08
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core
StandardWrapper.java
Log:
JspServlet (global or webapp-specific) must always be preloaded,
because its instance is used during registerJMX (when registering the
JSP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28244.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
43 matches
Mail list logo