cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/xdocs changelog.xml

mturk 2005/09/13 23:50:14 Modified:jk/native/common jk_lb_worker.c jk/xdocs changelog.xml Log: Fix lb for worker mpm's with cachesize set to lower number then ThreadsPerChild is. If retries is set to value larger then 3 sleep for 100 ms on each attempt. This enab

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_connect.h

mturk 2005/09/13 23:45:00 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c jk_connect.h Log: Make jk_sleep_def as nonstatic. Revision ChangesPath 1.120 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c Index: jk_ajp_common.c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: How strongly Tomcat 5.5.x will be committed to JDK 1.4.x in future..

Hi, Tomcat 5.5 will always allow JDK 1.4. Tomcat 6.0, as required by the J2EE 5 specifications, will require J2SE 5.0. I repeat, for emphasis, that this is required by the J2EE 5 Specification itself, which Tomcat 6.0 will support: it is not our decision to drop support for JDK 1.4. Yoav --- Gi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

How strongly Tomcat 5.5.x will be committed to JDK 1.4.x in future..

Hi, We'r puzzled between tomcat 5.0.x and 5.5.x. Due to our product restrictions we can't use JDK 1.5. Looked at jakarta web site, it seems that using tomcat 5.5.x seriese compated to 5.0.x is a good idea and recommended. Before committing our product to tomcat 5.5.9, I want to know how much

Bug in 5.5.9 ManagerServlet.deploy doing local file copy??

As a Tomcat user, I was trying to figure out deployment via the manager web app. I was using Ant (1.6.5), and the 'config' attribute specifying the context .xml file. I was under the impression that the config attribute described the .xml file as installed at Tomcat startup, e.g.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36541] - session getAttribute/setAttribute and removeAttribute are NOT Thread safe.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r280695 [1/5] - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/ xdocs/ xdocs/stylesheets/

Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 15:31:01 2005 New Revision: 280695 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280695&view=rev Log: Fix typos. Set eol=native for all files. Add some more content. Added: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/getinvolved.html (with props) tomcat/site/trunk/docs/svn.html (wi

svn commit: r280695 [5/5] - in /tomcat/site/trunk: docs/ xdocs/ xdocs/stylesheets/

Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml?rev=280695&r1=280694&r2=280695&view=diff == --- tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/whichversion.xml (origi

RE: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

Hi, Thanks for voicing your opinion. While it's welcome, it's not a binding vote, FYI, until you're a committer. Yoav --- Warren Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Bugs > > [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Commits > > [ ] forward to [E

svn commit: r280665 - in /tomcat/watchdog/tags/other: 4.x/ tc4.x/

Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:20:00 2005 New Revision: 280665 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280665&view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/tags/other/tc4.x/ - copied from r280664, tomcat/watchdog/tags/other/4.x/ Removed: tomcat/watchdog/tags/other

svn commit: r280664 - in /tomcat/watchdog/tags/other: 3.x/ tc3.x/

Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:19:41 2005 New Revision: 280664 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280664&view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/tags/other/tc3.x/ - copied from r280663, tomcat/watchdog/tags/other/3.x/ Removed: tomcat/watchdog/tags/other

svn commit: r280663 - in /tomcat/watchdog/branches/other: 4.x/ tc4.x/

Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:18:51 2005 New Revision: 280663 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280663&view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/tc4.x/ - copied from r280662, tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/4.x/ Removed: tomcat/watchdog/br

svn commit: r280662 - in /tomcat/watchdog/branches/other: 3.x/ tc3.x/

Author: markt Date: Tue Sep 13 14:18:26 2005 New Revision: 280662 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=280662&view=rev Log: Make dir names consistent Added: tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/tc3.x/ - copied from r280661, tomcat/watchdog/branches/other/3.x/ Removed: tomcat/watchdog/br

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote away :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

Bugs [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35765] - make the SSL cipher config in server.xml fail safe, i.e. 128+ bit strength by default

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vote away :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addition

RE: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

> > Bugs > [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Commits > [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Much easier to handle the volume of email if they are gated to separate lists. -

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

Per all the reasons Mark mentioned: Keith Bugs [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native (in module jakarta-tomcat-connectors) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Vote] (was Re: Top Level Project? Time for Top Level Lists?)

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Bugs [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commits [ ] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [X] forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Its easier (IMO) to filter on incoming address to different folders. It also may be more helpful to online l