Hi,
A question about enhancement adoption process - how long does it
typically take for new code to show up in CVS, in nightly builds? What
is the verification process for new code? I have posted enhancement
request to the mailing list and to Bugzilla
Hello,
Please find attached archive with sources for nsjk2 module. The module
targets AOLserver 4.0 beta 3 or later. The archive structure is rooted
at jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.1.18-src, and one can extract files
directly into the JTC-4.1.18 sources. I have successfully built nsjk2 on
Hello,
I am a developer at AOL and have been recently working on a JK2 family
module for AOLserver. The module is ready now and I'd like to take steps
necessary to contribute the sources to Tomcat project. I read the
guidelines for contribution, but still am a bit confused about the
process,
Alexander Leyke wrote:
Hi,
I need to use include directive in JSP that points to file physically
located outside directory tree for Web application context. I tested two
forms of include directive: %@include file=/../inc/name.inc % and
%@include file=/symlink/name.inc %.
As far as I can tell
Hi,
I need to use include directive in JSP that points to file physically
located outside directory tree for Web application context. I tested two
forms of include directive: %@include file=/../inc/name.inc % and
%@include file=/symlink/name.inc %.
As far as I can tell from Tomcat 4.1.18
I've seen similar problems - java is very sensitive to each thread
beeing 'registered'. My understanding is that attaching the
thread will set all the TLDs that are needed, and jk2 is calling the
attach method - so I don't know what is wrong here.
My bet would be on thread creation - I would
Hello,
I work on JK2 family module for AOLserver and use JNI to communicate
with Tomcat, so the JVM is running inside the Web server process. I
experience a problem with JVM 1.3.1 on Solaris 2.7/E250 and wonder if
anyone else has encountered a similar issue. It manifests itself as JVM
Costin Manolache wrote:
Are you using the jni channel ? Is that working too ?
No, it is the default ajp13 channel. I think I told you about my doubts
about jk_workerEnv.c hardcoding ajp13 as the type for all channel
initialization. Anyway, this is how the code looks like now (let me know
Costin Manolache wrote:
In jk2, all those strings are eliminated ( from C side ), we also eliminate
the buffer allocation ( we reuse the same jbyteArray and C array, with
code to eventually support NIO - that cuts 2 memcpy and few other small
things ). We also reduce the number of JNI calls to
Costin Manolache wrote:
I used BootstrapService because it didn't create the 8005 shutdown
socket. My tests were done with 4.0.
You can create your own wrapper, use CatalinaService directly or
call Bootstrap ( if you don't mind 8005 - in your case it doesn't
matter too much since you'll have a
Thanks for the reply, Costin. There are some more questions below.
Costin Manolache wrote:
Ajp13 protocol ( marshalling, etc ) is used for in-process communication
and out of process communication. By marshalling the data we avoid some
expensive and complex JNI operations, and benefit of all
Hello!
I am working on a JK2 module for AOLserver and would like to receive
feedback on JNI and compiler issues I encountered. My environment is
Solaris 7, AOLserver 3.4 and Tomcat 4.1.12. Issues:
1) Can't use JNI worker. AOLserver follows single-process,
multi-threaded architectural model
Costin Manolache wrote:
In jk2 we use ajp13 for all channels, including JNI. That allows us to reuse
the buffers and avoid object allocations from C - which improves a lot the
performance of the code ( we also avoid a lot of expensive calls, etc ).
Same technique is also used (AFAIK) in mozilla
13 matches
Mail list logo
