Re: Somebody get me off this List PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2001-07-05 Thread Earl Stutes
On 05 Jul 2001 18:10:42 +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote: Swart, James (Jim) ** CTR ** wrote: why is it everyone has such a hard time getting off this list? Someone put me in charge of getting people off the jarkata maillists, I'll make sure it's done to ensure these floods of get me off

j2sdk-1.4beta

2001-05-25 Thread Earl . Stutes
I have tomcat-3.2.2-b5/apache_1.3.19 running in the j2sdk-1.4 beta environment. I have not tested SSL/TLS yet, but plan to do that shortly. =eas=

Re: 'Just say no to JSP'

2001-04-06 Thread Earl . Stutes
Why has the tomcat-dev list become a Velocity advocacy list?? Isn't the purpose of this list supposed to be for communation between Tomcat developers? Is velocity recruiting or something? =eas= On 6 Apr, Paulo Gaspar wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Just say no to JSP Re: [Fwd: Tomcat may reveal script source code by URL trickery]

2001-04-04 Thread Earl . Stutes
An alternative view! On 4 Apr, Brad Cox wrote: At 11:24 AM -0700 04/04/2001, Jon Stevens wrote: I love the article title: "Just say no to JSP" I am really sorry to see folks coming on this list, and also publishing to the general web articles deriding JSP and tomcat in particular. I have

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 2

2001-04-02 Thread Earl . Stutes
On 2 Apr, GOMEZ Henri wrote: The bad news came from mod_webapp which didn't compile at all on my gcc (many bad structs declarations, missing includes in wa.h) Did Pier has commited all his change to cvs before beta2 was closed ? I have seen this for quite a while(several weeks), and just

Re: [FOLLOWUP] Proposed Tomcat 4.0-Beta-2 Code Freeze Date?

2001-03-28 Thread Earl . Stutes
On 27 Mar, George C. Hawkins wrote: PS does anyone else feel that a once a week status report would be a really good idea - nothing too big just a few lines from Craig say on what he felt had been achieved in the last week, general feelings on progess and non-binding comments on possible