-- Release Plan for Apache Tomcat 4.0 (final release)
[ ] +1I am in favor of this plan, and will help
[X] +0I am in favor of this plan, but am unable to help
[ ] -0I not in favor of this plan
[ ] -1I am opposed to this plan, and my reason(s) are:
does any one have the bug # for the "304 Not Modified" bug
of tomcat ?
thanks,
Henry
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patch to bug #345 complete ?
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, J
so this #345 bug fix which sends date in the header in the HTTP
response. Is there any use to this date at all ?
-Original Message-
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patch to bug #345 complete ?
, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:24:01AM -0700, Henry Yeh wrote:
> >
> > yes. I analyzed the HTTP header that's being sent and received by the
> > browser.
> > If-Modified-Since messages are sent to tomcat, and we are dealing with
> > st
:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patch to bug #345 complete ?
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:18:53AM -0700, Henry Yeh wrote:
>
> I have noticed that after applying the patch the date is now
> included in the tomcat HTTP response header, but it still
> does not send back "not m
I have noticed that after applying the patch the date is now
included in the tomcat HTTP response header, but it still
does not send back "not modified 304" if the file requested
hasn't been modified since the date specificed by the request ...
anyone has any ideas on how to fix this ? thanks !
please forward it to me if you will.
thanks!
Hen
