My use of search then bind is searching for a non-DN "user ID" (like UID or
mail, which is presumably unique) then binding witht he retrieved DN and
password. Can you imagine making people type in X.500-style user names
Martin
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> John Holman wrote:
> >
> > As said bef
This sounds excellent. I appreciate the ability to specify which attribute to
match: I plan to use "mail" in a current application.
I wonder if it wouldn't be useful to permit a principal or a credential to be an
attribute in the user's (subject's) own entry, e.g., "creditbalance." (For some
ty