RE: [5.0] JMX 1.2

Remy, Any further thoughts on this now the licencing issues appear to be resolved? Just thinking about how to fix bug 28178. Mark > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Amy Roh wrote: > > Hi Remy, > > > > JSR 160 will go final in October (assuming the final ballot > passes, as

Re: [5.0] JMX 1.2

Amy Roh wrote: Hi Remy, JSR 160 will go final in October (assuming the final ballot passes, as seems very likely). At that stage the RI will be released under essentially the same licensing terms as the JMX RI. So yes, Tomcat will be able to use it. Ok, so I won't bundle the binary until then

Re: [5.0] JMX 1.2

Hi Remy, JSR 160 will go final in October (assuming the final ballot passes, as seems very likely). At that stage the RI will be released under essentially the same licensing terms as the JMX RI. So yes, Tomcat will be able to use it. Amy Remy Maucherat wrote: As discussed before, I'm going

[5.0] JMX 1.2

As discussed before, I'm going to package the JMX RI 1.2.1 with TC 5.0.x from now on (after testing, of course). I'll leave MX4J part of the build process. Q to the Sun folks: can I legally ship the JMX remote 1.0 RI binary with Tomcat ? Remy -