cherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 12:16 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote
>
>
> So I will anounce Tomcat 5.0.19 and 4.1.30 on monda
- Original Message -
From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 4:41 AM
Subject: [5.0.19] Release vote
Release 5.0.19
So I will anounce Tomcat 5.0.19 and 4.1.30 on monday. What about 3.3.2,
BTW ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Jess Holle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote
> Bill Barker wrote:
>
> >It looked like it should wo
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
just found another small issue (seen on Linux and Win32) - the link
on the Tomcat main page to webdav now produces a directory listing
rather than call index.html
This is normal as well.
I noticed it this morning, as well (on Solaris 8 and 9). Just out
Bill Barker wrote:
It looked like it should work, but I couldn't free up a machine to test it
on (until now :). You can get rid of the messages by adding:
request.registerRequests=false
to your jk2.properties file.
Thanks.
What are the other effects of taking this action (and not taking thi
o: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0.19] Release vote
Jess Holle wrote:
>*Feb 17, 2004 5:01:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest
>decodeRequest
>WARNING: Error registering request*
For so
Guenter Knauf wrote:
This is as intended, and is indeed a change in behavior. I
understand it could cause trouble for some applications, but is a
lot cleaner and more efficient.
but it prevents to move applications from TC4 to TC5 since they dont
work out-of-the-box as before, f.e. *.war. isnt ther
Hi Remy,
>> two things I found (which are probably older bugs, seen them with
>> 5.0.18 too):
>>
>> - if I call snoop.jsp directly through Tomcat I get 'Content length:
>> -1' while through mod_jk2 I get 'Content length: 0'
> Both are acceptable, but -1 is more accurate.
ok.
>> - redirection to t
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[X] Yes
[ ] No
This build seems ok overall. (I'll move it for mirrorring)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jess Holle wrote:
*Feb 17, 2004 5:01:39 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest
decodeRequest
WARNING: Error registering request*
For some reason, the request isn't registered in JMX (which is used
for). It wasn't registered either in previous builds, so I suppose it's
not a big change ;)
Tomcat 5.0.19 seems to work well enough.
One question, though.
I'm now seeing the following messages as I test my application:
*Feb 17, 2004 4:59:34 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest
decodeRequest
WARNING: Error registering request*
Feb 17, 2004 4:59:38 PM org.apache.jk.server.J
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[ X] Yes
[ ] No
All Servlet/JSP tcks passes with/without validation/security. I've fixed
a minor jmx problem that should not stop the release.
-- Jeanfrancois
Rémy
-
To uns
Howdy,
>-Original Message-
>From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:42 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: [5.0.19] Release vote
>
>
>Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
>[ X ] Yes
>[ ] No
>
Nothing seems broken, go
FWIW, tested a couple of my own webapps with Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 +
Sun JVM 1.4.2_03 (no apache) without problem.
-- A
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[x] Yes
[ ] No
tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on:
SuSE Linux 7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.
AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [5.0.19] Release vote
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Incoming mail is
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Release 5.0.19 as Stable: [x] Yes [ ] No
tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on: SuSE Linux
7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 Novell NetWare 6.5 mod_jk2 JVM Sun
1.4.2_02 Novell NetWare 6.0 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.1_05 Win2K SP4
mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03 WinX
Hi,
>
> Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
> [x] Yes
> [ ] No
>
tested that it starts fine and that the samples work on:
SuSE Linux 7.0 + 8.2 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03
Novell NetWare 6.5 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_02
Novell NetWare 6.0 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.1_05
Win2K SP4 mod_jk2 JVM Sun 1.4.2_03
WinXP SP1 mod_j
Release 5.0.19 as Stable:
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo