Kief Morris wrote:
>
> Hans Bergsten typed the following on 19:17 10/12/2000 -0800
> >But maybe I'm missing something. Are you saying the whole SSI processing
> >should be done as an interceptor instead of as a servlet?
>
> Is this something that could be done as a Servlet 2.3 Filter, and so b
Hans Bergsten typed the following on 19:17 10/12/2000 -0800
>But maybe I'm missing something. Are you saying the whole SSI processing
>should be done as an interceptor instead of as a servlet?
Is this something that could be done as a Servlet 2.3 Filter, and so be
completely
container independ
> Okay, I appreciate if you can take a look at it. I must admit I have not
> looked at the interceptor stuff enough to see how it should be done. To
> me, "interceptor" sounds like something that intercepts a specific request
> and does something with it, not a component that can provide an interf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> Ok, too much discutions off-topic - I wouldn't mind if you keep the
> org.apache.java.* ( and maybe import some more ), instead of
> org.apache.ssi.util :-)
Okay.
> > What's needed for integration is, first of all, an interface with
> > these methods:
> >
> >
>
> Even though the "org.apache.java.*" classes are not directly tied to
> JSSI, I have a feeling they are not all that useful for other projects.
> And without a real "shared Java utils" package within Apache, it's a
> pain to coordinate the development of shared code. I therefore suggest
> thi
Jeff Turner wrote:
> > [...]
> > That's a good idea, and jakarta-jsse is as good a name as any ;-)
>
> If I may be the first to throw cold water on that name.. JSSE already
> stands for Java Secure Socket Extension
> (http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/), which is necessary for Tomcat's SSL
> sup
--
God made the integers; all else is the work of Man.
-- Kronecker
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Hans Bergsten wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 1) Make this a new Jakarta subproject, named jakarta-jssi.
> > >The reason for this is that it's an optional module and i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> > 1) Make this a new Jakarta subproject, named jakarta-jssi.
> >The reason for this is that it's an optional module and it can
> >live its own life outside the container development.
>
> +1 - but I would like more a "generic" name ( jakarta-jsse - java
Hi Hans,
> for tags and NCSA SSI directives, I decided to port Apache
> JSSI to Tomcat. Now it's basically done for TC 3.2, and the question is
> what to do with it ;-)
> 1) Make this a new Jakarta subproject, named jakarta-jssi.
>The reason for this is that it's an optional module and it
Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 12/9/2000 6:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > If it is Tomcat-specific, is there any reason it really needs to be a separate
> > Jakarta project at all? Why not just absorb it into Tomcat?
>
> Problem with that in my eyes is that Tomcat is su
on 12/9/2000 6:21 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If it is Tomcat-specific, is there any reason it really needs to be a separate
> Jakarta project at all? Why not just absorb it into Tomcat?
Problem with that in my eyes is that Tomcat is supposed to be the reference
imple
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> [...]
> If it is Tomcat-specific, is there any reason it really needs to be a separate
> Jakarta project at all? Why not just absorb it into Tomcat?
>
> In terms of CVS repositories, if the amount of version-dependent code is large it
> would be easier just to put
Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 12/9/2000 3:55 PM, "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know the migration of Java Apache projects has been discussed, but
> > I have not seen a formal decision being made by PMC. So I like to
> > run it by the PMC anyway, but based on what you say it sounds
on 12/9/2000 3:55 PM, "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know the migration of Java Apache projects has been discussed, but
> I have not seen a formal decision being made by PMC. So I like to
> run it by the PMC anyway, but based on what you say it sounds like it
> will not be any pro
Jon Stevens wrote:
> [...]
> > 1) Make this a new Jakarta subproject, named jakarta-jssi.
> > The reason for this is that it's an optional module and it can
> > live its own life outside the container development.
> >
> > Note! This requires approval by the PMC, but I want to see what
> > this gro
on 12/9/2000 1:48 PM, "Hans Bergsten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After seeing a number of users on the TC user list asking about support
> for tags and NCSA SSI directives, I decided to port Apache
> JSSI to Tomcat. Now it's basically done for TC 3.2, and the question is
> what to do with it ;
After seeing a number of users on the TC user list asking about support
for tags and NCSA SSI directives, I decided to port Apache
JSSI to Tomcat. Now it's basically done for TC 3.2, and the question is
what to do with it ;-)
If anyone is interested in this, I propose the following:
1) Make
17 matches
Mail list logo
