Re: [VOTE]: Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2002-07-24 Thread Henri Gomez
I can live with any but the first. It would be nice to have it as a config option however. JkOptions is probably fine for 1.2. Not sure where it should be set in Jk2. Thanks. I'm not sure about mod_jk2 either. The latest reports show that the code still doesn't work. Great to have

[VOTE]: Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2002-07-23 Thread Bojan Smojver
And I answer (to myself :-) On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 14:47, Bojan Smojver wrote: So, the unsolved questions for me are: 1. What is it then that jk_handler() does that makes it actually serve the request when DIR_MAGIC_TYPE is included in the test? It must be that its mapping is 'better' than

Re: [VOTE]: Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2002-07-23 Thread Bill Barker
Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone thinks. So, here are the choices: [ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat [ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned on/off [ ] Remove DIR_MAGIC_TYPE handling altogether [ ] Make

Re: [VOTE]: Re: cvs commit:jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

2002-07-23 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 23:39, Henri Gomez wrote: Before I make any changes to the CVS, I'd like to know what everyone thinks. So, here are the choices: [ ] Keep it as is and send all DIR_MAGIC_TYPE requests to Tomcat [ ] Keep it as is, but only if DIR_MAGIC_TYPE can be turned on/off