Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Remy Maucherat wrote: > Martin Algesten wrote: >> This is the soundest idea I've heard so far. Multiple distributions >> sounds like disaster area to me. I currently think it is hard enough for >> a new user to decide Tomcat3/Tomcat4.x/Tomcat5 when presented with the >> choices. If there in additi

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 9/12/02 23:58 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It >> should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made >> and was voted on tomcat-dev. > > I swear that _LOVE_ my

RE: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

> -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 December 2002 10:55 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 ) > > I really cannot believe I could agree with you on something ;-) >

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Martin Algesten wrote: This is the soundest idea I've heard so far. Multiple distributions sounds like disaster area to me. I currently think it is hard enough for a new user to decide Tomcat3/Tomcat4.x/Tomcat5 when presented with the choices. If there in addition to that is "Tomcat4 lite", "Tomca

RE: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

; -Original Message- > From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 December 2002 10:35 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 ) > > It's exactly what SHOULD BE DONE in a modular approach of TC 5. > > A sma

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Like the httpd, I'd prefer having a full distribution of all safe (yes, Jasper is safe) and generally useful modules. Experienced users can tweak the configuration to their likin

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is one big huge difference... Modules are DSOs, if you don't enable them in your httpd.conf, they don't get loaded, they don't get used Disabling all of them can be done

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like the httpd, I'd prefer having a full distribution of all safe (yes, > Jasper is safe) and generally useful modules. Experienced users can > tweak the configuration to their liking, and it is easy t

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 10/12/02 8:40 am, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I remember perfectly, and this Tomcat-HA was a complete joke. You > proposed a new implementation of the Catalina classes, which doesn't > make sense given the current Tomcat state That's what I was a

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 23:58 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made and was voted on tomcat-dev. I swear that _LOVE_ my mates... My

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 23:58 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It > should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made > and was voted on tomcat-dev. I swear that _LOVE_ my mates... My friend Tonia, who's a

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 10/12/02 0:10 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It >> should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made >> and was voted on tomcat-dev. > > Then find it. I believe it never even went to [

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 3:58 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's hard to find something that doesn't exist. ? > I hate the practice of using old postings as arguments in most cases - > it's normal for people to change their minds. There is a difference between changing your mind and m

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: >>> I remember that when I proposed the same thing (roughly) and wanted to >>> call it "Tomcat-HA" or something like it, you said: >>> >>> "If possible, please also change the name - unless ASF gives you >>> permission to use tomcat name in your product." >> >> Can you poin

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 23:38 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to >>> have an official vote on my prior proposal. >>> >>> This is the list

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to >> have an official vote on my prior proposal. >> >> This is the list of included features: >> >> Libs: >> - JMX >> - JAAS >> - JNDI >> - diges

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to > have an official vote on my prior proposal. > > This is the list of included features: > > Libs: > - JMX > - JAAS > - JNDI > - digester ( and beanutils, collections it n

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 9:37 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then make a proposal that "maximum 2 tomcat binary distribution should be > allowed". I will -1 this vote. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://studioz.tv

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 9:37 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see why a vote on Jon's proposal would affect my proposal > ( or any future vote ). I agree. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://studioz.tv/ --

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 7:16 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Votes: > [ ] +1 I like the idea, I might help > [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. +0 I don't have time to help, but I like the idea. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comma

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Votes: [X] +1 I like the idea, I might help [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. Costin -- Jeanfrancois -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Votes: [ ] +1 I like the idea, I might help [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. I'll have to vote -1 until the other vote completes, and then, I'll either be: - +1 if Jon's proposal doesn't pass - -1 if Jon proposal is accepted, unless Jasp

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >> Votes: >> [ ] +1 I like the idea, I might help >> [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. > > I'll have to vote -1 until the other vote completes, and then, I'll > either be: > - +1 if Jon's proposal doesn't pass > - -1 if Jon proposal is accepted, unless Jasper is

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation

[VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation of some tasks ) - common