Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

Jeff Tulley wrote: Easier said than done. An interesting observation is the fact that everybody thought things were stable, and as far as any reports coming in, it seemed things were. However, once Remy declared 4.1.17 as stable, suddenly people actually started putting Catalina through it's pac

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

Easier said than done. An interesting observation is the fact that everybody thought things were stable, and as far as any reports coming in, it seemed things were. However, once Remy declared 4.1.17 as stable, suddenly people actually started putting Catalina through it's paces(to see if they wa

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

Remy, I checked the cvs and found there are some number of changes in the writer and response in coyote starting from 4.1.12. (See the diff from 4.1.12). Many of the changes are started at around 4.1.15/16. I think there is the problem in the roll out procedures, especially when a release is

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

> Please review, and vote ASAP: > > > [X] Yes > [ ] No > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

Please review, and vote ASAP: [x] Yes [ ] No -Matt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

Please review, and vote ASAP: [X] Yes [ ] No Amy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

I'm not a commiter (so no real vote), but I was just on the verge of patching in these very fixes into 4.1.17 as it is useless to me without them. I would *REALLY* appreciate a speedy 4.1.18 release. -- Jess Holle Remy Maucherat wrote: A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16 and Tomcat

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

+1 Cheers, Larry > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:15 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release > > > A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16

RE: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

> > [X] Yes > [ ] No > I'm suffering by the bug. :( -Original Message- From: Mark Plotnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:00 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release ** Reply to message from Remy

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

** Reply to message from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 19 Dec 2002 12:15:19 +0100 > > It is proposed that Tomcat 4.1.18, based on the Tomcat 4.1.17 code, with > > Please review, and vote ASAP: > > > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > [X] Yes -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

+1 -- Jeanfrancois Remy Maucherat wrote: A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16 and Tomcat 4.1.17 which causes the servlet Writer to stay in an invalid state after an IOException occurs (99% of the time caused by an abrupt client disconnection). After this happens, the processor will

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

I think we don't have too many choices here - it's something we must do. +1 Costin Remy Maucherat wrote: > A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16 and Tomcat 4.1.17 which > causes the servlet Writer to stay in an invalid state after an > IOException occurs (99% of the time caused by an a

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

+1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

As a user that have this problem too. [YES] On Thursday 19 December 2002 12:15, you wrote: > A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16 and Tomcat 4.1.17 which > causes the servlet Writer to stay in an invalid state after an > IOException occurs (99% of the time caused by an abrupt clien

[VOTE] Tomcat 4.1.18 release

A bug exists (unfortunately) in Tomcat 4.1.16 and Tomcat 4.1.17 which causes the servlet Writer to stay in an invalid state after an IOException occurs (99% of the time caused by an abrupt client disconnection). After this happens, the processor will never be able to output data using the Write