RE: 3.3 build

2001-03-12 Thread GOMEZ Henri
L PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 11:17 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: 3.3 build > > >Hi, > >I'm doing some fixes in the nightly build, and I was wondering about >changing the default to what most other jakarta projects are using. > >I hate creati

Re: 3.3 build

2001-03-10 Thread Mel Martinez
+0 Same sentiments as Nacho. I don't like it, but I can cave in to peer pressure with the best of 'em... :-) 'Course this means I'll have to change all my own damn customized scripts again... :-( Mel --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing some fixes in the nightly build, and I was

RE: 3.3 build

2001-03-09 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> Let me know what you think - I would be very happy to hear > you strongly > disagree with mixing the source and build result, but if no I strongly %*+-=&/) but not disagree.. > commiter -1 > it I guess we should do it. > I dont like it but i cant -1 it, everybody seems very conviced that t

3.3 build

2001-03-09 Thread cmanolache
Hi, I'm doing some fixes in the nightly build, and I was wondering about changing the default to what most other jakarta projects are using. I hate creating build in jakarta-tomcat - but since most other projects adopted this we should do it in 3.3 too. Now it's the right moment ( since we are p

RE: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-02 Thread GOMEZ Henri
>Take a look at any RedHat ( or any similar, RPM-based linux system): >/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/my-package >/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/my-package Just to complement, the RPM (not only Redhat) way : Sources (+ patches) are in : /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ ie: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/jakarta-tomcat-src.t

RE: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-01 Thread Steve Downey
d-gcc-2.95.2-cygwin-cross-linux ... ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3.3 build tree > I see what you are saying, that a "make install" usually creates the fil

Re: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-01 Thread cmanolache
> I see what you are saying, that a "make install" usually creates the files > in etc or opt rather and not in the source directory. I guess I look at > "build" as more equivalent to "make", because I ususally just copy the > resulting directory structure from build to the production location > ma

Re: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-01 Thread Remy Maucherat
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I can say the same about building in the source directory... It just > feels > wrong and ugly ( kind of like having .class and .java in the same > directory, instead of using javac -d ). Same here, I hate that too. Since most people involed with Tomcat seem to like

Re: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-01 Thread Christopher Cain
Steve Downey wrote: > then, from in the bld-gcc-2.95.2, you run ../gcc-2.95.2/configure, and the > build environment is created, while the source environment remains pristine. > This is imperative if you're building for several environments out of the > same source tree. In which case you might h

Re: 3.3 build tree

2001-02-01 Thread Christopher Cain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > > > And +1 for TC 3.x branch. > > > > Yes, please. =) > > Not so fast, please :-) > > There are scripts and people using the current style. > > -0 on changing 3.x: > I think the sources and binaries shouldn't be in the same directory > tree

3.3 build tree

2001-02-01 Thread cmanolache
> GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > > And +1 for TC 3.x branch. > > Yes, please. =) Not so fast, please :-) There are scripts and people using the current style. -0 on changing 3.x: I think the sources and binaries shouldn't be in the same directory tree ( look at RedHat /usr/src hierarchy, look at g