:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 12:40 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Annoyance in the deployer
Hi,
Not something major, but there's that in the deployer:
// Make sure there is an application configuration
directory
Cox, Charlie wrote:
It is annoying. I have a remote share on the network that is only static
files and I had to convince someone to create a WEB-INF folder on that share
and give them a nearly-empty web.xml. I would prefer to not have to maintain
it.
I don't quite understand your setup, though. If
Em Seg, 2004-12-06 às 17:10 +0100, Remy Maucherat escreveu:
Cox, Charlie wrote:
It is annoying. I have a remote share on the network that is only static
files and I had to convince someone to create a WEB-INF folder on that share
and give them a nearly-empty web.xml. I would prefer to not
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thank you for contacting DigitalEyes.net. We received your e-mail message at
10:43:22 AM on 12/6/04. To ensure your message is handled in a timely and
efficient manner, we have assigned a tracking number to your e-mail,
T2004120600MT. Please use this number when
suggested, a flag to change the behavior would also help.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 11:11 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: Annoyance in the deployer
Cox, Charlie wrote:
It is annoying. I have
Bill Barker wrote:
Hi,
Not something major, but there's that in the deployer:
// Make sure there is an application configuration
directory
// This is needed if the Context appBase is the same
as the
// web server document root to make sure only web
Hi,
Not something major, but there's that in the deployer:
// Make sure there is an application configuration directory
// This is needed if the Context appBase is the same as the
// web server document root to make sure only web
applications
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 9:39 AM
Subject: Annoyance in the deployer
Hi,
Not something major, but there's that in the deployer:
// Make sure
