DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4401>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4401

error at apache startup - symbol ap_log_error: referenced not found

           Summary: error at apache startup - symbol ap_log_error:
                    referenced not found
           Product: Tomcat 4
           Version: Nightly Build
          Platform: Sun
        OS/Version: Solaris
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Blocker
          Priority: Other
         Component: Webapps
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


We tried to install tomcat 4.0 with gcc 2.95.3 on Solaris 8 but ran into
relocation error problems.  We think the problem was due to us having
openssl-0.9.6b compiled with cc but apache-1.3.22 and tomcat-4.0.1 compiled with
gcc.

We recompiled all packages using Sun's C compiler (forte 6.1) and ran the
configtest with no errors (we had to use the cvs build of tomcat to fix a
compilation problem) and it looked like it was okay:

cougar:/web/apache#./bin/apachectl configtest
[Wed Oct 24 12:13:01 2001] [error] Cannot resolve host name Optional ---
ignoring!
[Wed Oct 24 12:13:01 2001] [alert] httpd: Could not determine the server's
fully qualified domain name, using 132.170.240.32 for ServerName
Syntax OK

However, when we tried to start the web server, we got this error in the
error_log (previously our errors were being detected when we ran configtest):

Wed Oct 24 12:01:47 2001] [notice] SIGHUP received.  Attempting to
restart
Syntax error on line 206 of /web/apache_1.3.22/conf/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /web/apache_1.3.22/libexec/mod_webapp.so into server: ld.so.1:
/web/apache_1.3.22/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
/web/apache_1.3.22/libexec/mod_webapp.so: symbol ap_log_error: referenced
symbol not found

Any other tips or ideas?  Should we give up and go back to forcing gcc for
opensll so that all of the components have the same compiler?

Reply via email to