RE: Interceptors ( was Re: 3.x vs 4.0 architecture Q's

2001-01-18 Thread Paulo Gaspar
> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 23:04 > > One appropriate question to ask yourself, when comparing, is > "what does having 15 > entry points give me that I cannot get with a single entry point > approach"? I

Re: Interceptors ( was Re: 3.x vs 4.0 architecture Q's

2001-01-18 Thread Jon Stevens
on 1/18/01 2:03 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO, copying a web server (written in C, by the way) architecture, in and > of itself, is not a compelling argument to influence the design of a servlet > container written in an object oriented language like Java. +1 -jon

Re: Interceptors ( was Re: 3.x vs 4.0 architecture Q's

2001-01-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Looking at the latest 3.x src drops, there are say ~30 methods in > > BaseInterceptor, that is access points, into the request chain / context > > mapping / session handling etc. This obviously gives a degree of > > Hi Ken, > > All this will be reviewed and documente

Interceptors ( was Re: 3.x vs 4.0 architecture Q's

2001-01-18 Thread cmanolache
> Looking at the latest 3.x src drops, there are say ~30 methods in > BaseInterceptor, that is access points, into the request chain / context > mapping / session handling etc. This obviously gives a degree of Hi Ken, All this will be reviewed and documented - if the release proposal is accepte