RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: Mail from Stallman on legality of LGPL in jboss

2000-11-10 Thread marc fleury
|> There were 2 questions (my questions are indented) |> |> is integrating the library with other work (without any modification to |> the |> Library) a "modification of the Library" in case of the LGPL? |> |> No, it is not. It is just using the library. The whole reason for |> the LGPL is to gi

Re: Mail from Stallman on legality of LGPL in jboss

2000-11-10 Thread Jon Stevens
on 11/10/2000 10:33 AM, "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry from the crosspost > > > So we asked Mr Stallman to state the obvious, the man obliged. State what exactly? Oh wait...you put that at the bottom of your email...ug... > it was a waste of time/energy What was a waste of

Mail from Stallman on legality of LGPL in jboss

2000-11-10 Thread marc fleury
Sorry from the crosspost So we asked Mr Stallman to state the obvious, the man obliged. it was a waste of time/energy 1- Using our library in ANY software, without modification, does not trigger LGPL coverage. 2- Developing our libraries and linking to non Free software is permitted with LGPL,