Bill Barker wrote:
That is fine as long as you build and run on a 1.4+ JDK but when checking
for 1.3 compatibility the Coyote/HTTP connector fails. The root cause is
the use of the 1.4 regexp API in o.a.coyote.http11.Http11Processor
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=109403344007532&w=
-
> From: "Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tomcat Developers List"
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Migration to Subversion
>
>
> > Yoav Shapira wrote:
> > >
> > >>Any and all comments apprecia
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List"
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: Migration to Subversion
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
> >
> >>Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
a. Should more 3.x.x versions should be included in 4 & 5 above?
b. I have assumed that all releases before 5.5.x will use the 5.0 branch
of the connectors. Is this assumption valid?
I don't think so. Some Tomcat 3.x versio
On 7/27/05, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> Following up on my offer to trial a Subversion migration using Watchdog, I
> started to think that it would be a good idea to have an idea of what we want
> our eventual Subversion layout to look like so we could target the Watchdog
> c
Hi,
> Any and all comments appreciated. In particular:
> a. Should more 3.x.x versions should be included in 4 & 5 above?
> b. I have assumed that all releases before 5.5.x will use the 5.0 branch
> of the connectors. Is this assumption valid?
I don't think so. Some Tomcat 3.x versions, for exa
All,
Following up on my offer to trial a Subversion migration using Watchdog, I
started to think that it would be a good idea to have an idea of what we want
our eventual Subversion layout to look like so we could target the Watchdog
conversion to that layout and save rework at a later date.
