Re: Precompiled jsps

2003-01-22 Thread White Knight
king at the code - I think it is a bit too > complicated to add the JMX to jasper ( at least for my > current free time ). However it works perfectly fine with the > precompiled jsps - and IMO any decent production server should > precompile the jsps ( and get JMX as yet another ben

Re: Precompiled jsps

2003-01-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
arguments ;-) After more looking at the code - I think it is a bit too complicated to add the JMX to jasper ( at least for my current free time ). However it works perfectly fine with the precompiled jsps - and IMO any decent production server should precompile the jsps ( and get JMX as yet another

Precompiled jsps

2003-01-21 Thread Costin Manolache
MX to jasper ( at least for my current free time ). However it works perfectly fine with the precompiled jsps - and IMO any decent production server should precompile the jsps ( and get JMX as yet another benefit of doing so ) Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-18 17:45 --- Yes, adding the line permission java.lang.R

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-18 16:40 --- Instead of Tomcat trying to fine tune the package access rules, why not just a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-07-18 16:25 --- precompiling a simple JSP containing only "hello world" give

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10902] New: - "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation

2002-07-17 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902 "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation Summary: "package.access" security check too general for Jasper - precompiled JSPs get package-access violation