Costin Manolache wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Au menu:
- Using Embedded
- Using JMX (which I think is cool)
- Using the in-memory connector
Speaking of which, the in-memory connector might be good for a bare
bones JNI connector, if someone wants to try. The current JK JNI has
about the same over
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Au menu:
- Using Embedded
- Using JMX (which I think is cool)
- Using the in-memory connector
Speaking of which, the in-memory connector might be good for a bare
bones JNI connector, if someone wants to try. The current JK JNI has
about the same overhead os a socket, so it
Petr Jiricka wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Petr Jiricka wrote:
BTW, this isn't really relevant, but the in memory connector is now
working (= no socket). The older TC 4.x could be invoked in memory as
well, but the API was cumbersome.
I thought this could be useful in Netbeans (but last time, yo
The SMEA web sever has detected virus(s) in your Email.
Please scan your email before resending.
The Mail was auto generated by the recepient's web host provider.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Petr Jiricka wrote:
BTW, this isn't really relevant, but the in memory connector is now
working (= no socket). The older TC 4.x could be invoked in memory as
well, but the API was cumbersome.
I thought this could be useful in Netbeans (but last time, you weren't
intereste
Petr Jiricka wrote:
BTW, this isn't really relevant, but the in memory connector is now
working (= no socket). The older TC 4.x could be invoked in memory as
well, but the API was cumbersome.
I thought this could be useful in Netbeans (but last time, you weren't
interested, apparently), and now
Petr Jiricka wrote:
Well, this sounds quite alarming to me. Looks like there is no guarantee
that the contents of the build really contains the intended codeline.
If you are worried, you should make verifications. Get the source bundle
and diff.
Rémy
---
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange issue with 5.0.23 that's making me question my stable
vote from earlier today. It has to do with a 3rd party servlet which
checks for the presence of a cookie, if not found prompts for some user
information, and then redirects (resp
Kin-Man Chung wrote:
Which watchdog is it? Can you send me the other part (tld and tag handler)
of it?
It's Watchdog 4. It's the XML tests (obviously), and it is run in the
release target.
If the tag is of a TAGDEPENDENT body type, then its body is should not
be evaluated. It used to be evaluat
golden file for the watchdog test should be replaced.
-Kin-man
> Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 02:26:32 +0200
> From: Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Question on 5.0.23
> To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have some possible problems w
I have some possible problems with Jasper and XML syntax. One example
from old watchdog:
http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page"; version="1.2"
xmlns:direct="urn:jsptld:/WEB-INF/tlds/example-taglib.tld"
>
Generates for the tag:
do {
out.write("");
out.write("\n");
Hi,
>I don't like moving tags, so it's 5.0.24, and I picked up the right
>version for CoyoteRequest this time :-/
Downloaded and tested 5.0.24, it works fine. You hit the nail right on
the head. I'm ready to vote on it. Thanks again,
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any attachments, is
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Thanks. Is it still 5.0.23 then, and I should re-download and retest?
I don't like moving tags, so it's 5.0.24, and I picked up the right
version for CoyoteRequest this time :-/
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Hi,
>I did update the build.
Thanks. Is it still 5.0.23 then, and I should re-download and retest?
Yoav Shapira
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This
e-mail i
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Thanks for the quick investigation and resolution. ;)
I'm formally withdrawing my stable vote for 5.0.23 because of this bug.
I couldn't find 5.0.20-5.0.22 for download, but IIRC 5.0.22 worked fine.
I'll gladly test 5.0.24 as soon as it's available. Thanks again,
I did updat
Hi,
>I did find what the problem was: I did some testing, so I checked out
an
>earlier revision of the file (CoyoteRequest, of course). Unfortunately,
>I'm using a new CVS tool with which I have less experience (tortoise) -
>not that I wanted to, but WinCVS decided to simply stop working one day
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange issue with 5.0.23 that's making me question my stable
vote from earlier today. It has to do with a 3rd party servlet which
checks for the presence of a cookie, if not found prompts for some user
information, and then redirects (response.sendRedirect) to an
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I have a strange issue with 5.0.23 that's making me question my stable
vote from earlier today. It has to do with a 3rd party servlet which
checks for the presence of a cookie, if not found prompts for some user
information, and then redirects (response.sendRedirect) to an
Hi,
I have a strange issue with 5.0.23 that's making me question my stable
vote from earlier today. It has to do with a 3rd party servlet which
checks for the presence of a cookie, if not found prompts for some user
information, and then redirects (response.sendRedirect) to another page.
The exac
19 matches
Mail list logo
