RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-06-04 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 30. svibanj 2002 16:56 > To: Mladen Turk > Cc: 'Ignacio J. Ortega' > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2 > > > On Thu, 30 May 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > >

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-06-04 Thread costinm
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > There will be four classes dealing with particular Apache hook > 1. Handler > 2. Input Filter > 3. Output Filter > 4. Protocol For Handler - you should use JkHandler. We can add some more methods if you need, but it would be better to minimize the number

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-06-04 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 4. lipanj 2002 22:00 > To: Mladen Turk > Cc: 'List Tomcat-Dev' > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2 > > > > > > That's my goal too. The Java side w

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-06-04 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 4. lipanj 2002 20:34 > To: Mladen Turk > Cc: List Tomcat-Dev > Subject: RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2 > > > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > > > There will be

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-06-04 Thread costinm
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > We are talking _apache_ modules true? > They extends the _apache_ server, so one writing one should be familiar > with the .conf I think. > In theory some functionality could be reused on other servers like > authentication, and I'm not sure I want to do t

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-06-04 Thread costinm
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Mladen Turk wrote: > > We can add a 'handler' property to reflect the java-side > > handler that will be executed ( or one for the handler type > > and one for the instance). > > I can extend the JkUriSet, but I need the the table of handlers, input > filters, output filter

Re: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-05-29 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: >>Now on Solaris I have the following: >>+++ >>bash-2.03$ bin/apachectl stop >>Syntax error on line 262 of >>/export/home2/apache20/apache20/conf/httpd.conf: >>Cannot load >>/export/home2/apache20/apache20/modules/mod_jk2.so into server: ld.s >>o.1: /export/home2/apache2

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-05-29 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
> Now on Solaris I have the following: > +++ > bash-2.03$ bin/apachectl stop > Syntax error on line 262 of > /export/home2/apache20/apache20/conf/httpd.conf: > Cannot load > /export/home2/apache20/apache20/modules/mod_jk2.so into server: ld.s > o.1: /export/home2/apache20/apache20/bin/httpd: fat

Re: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-05-29 Thread jean-frederic clere
Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: > Thanks, Mladen.. > > Dohh, forgot compile before commit.. sorry.. > > I will move the win32 logger to common jk2, and as far it follows the > null factory pattern ( the same that Unix Sockets channel is doing ), > there is no need to ifdef it in registry, and because i

RE: [PATCH] Apache2 mod_jk2

2002-05-29 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Thanks, Mladen.. Dohh, forgot compile before commit.. sorry.. I will move the win32 logger to common jk2, and as far it follows the null factory pattern ( the same that Unix Sockets channel is doing ), there is no need to ifdef it in registry, and because it's OS dependant capability ( as Unix