It may be configurable, to allow both choices?
André
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 June 2002 10:26
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: RE: [PATCH] When Session Max reached, throw out oldest session
>Agreed... If we start invalidating sessi
>Agreed... If we start invalidating sessions when too much memory is
>"wasted", I'm going to choose a different servlet engine for
>my 10m req/day
>site... :) If I define that a session has a timeout, I want
>that timeout to
>be _real_ and if I run into memory problems, well, that's my
>problem
Michael E. Locasto typed the following on 08:00 PM 6/18/2002 -0400
>I've done a bit of thinking and came up with a mechanism that might
>solve both issues of wasted memory and "lost" users. It involves
>persistent storage of "retired" sessions, so if this is actually how
>LRUMap or the session Man
Agreed... If we start invalidating sessions when too much memory is
"wasted", I'm going to choose a different servlet engine for my 10m req/day
site... :) If I define that a session has a timeout, I want that timeout to
be _real_ and if I run into memory problems, well, that's my problem, not
your
It may not be as easy as it seems. We don't need to preserve only the
session ID, but any data that has been put in the session. And I don't
think there is a requirement in the specs for the data to be serializable.
So a session that may have been "pushed" into secondary memory, may not,
in cer
memory
to bring the session back in.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Michael E. Locasto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] When Session Max reached, th
>
> Sessions, or server memory, is a limited resource. So no matter how
> you slice it your bar isnt going to be able to please everybody. This
> proposal/patch allows the sober guy to enter and escorts the had too
> much guy out.
Not to stir the pot, but this is a bit of a false analogy. The p
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Tomcat Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: [PATCH] When Session Max reached,
>
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Tomcat Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [PATCH] When Session Max reached, throw out ol
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tomcat Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PATCH] When Session Max reached, throw out oldest session
>
>
> Thi
10 matches
Mail list logo